This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (27)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Raymond Cogen, MD, MBA; Beth Patterson, MSN, RN; Stephen Chavin, MD; Jan Cogen; Lisa Landsberg, MEd; Joel Posner, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1992;152(9):1885-1888.

Abstract
Background.—
In the absence of advanced directives, physicians treating demented patients rely on surrogates to help make medical care decisions.

Method.—
We surveyed family members of severely demented nursing home residents to determine preferences for medical intervention in five hypothetical situations involving tube feeding, hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Results.—
Only 11.8% of surrogates rejected all interventions. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and tube feeding were accepted least frequently (31.6% and 36.4%, respectively). Mechanical ventilation, hospitalization, and intensive care unit admission were accepted by 43.6%, 63.4%, and 75.2%, respectively. There was no correlation between previous surrogate experience with an intervention and its acceptance. Nearly 70% of surrogates indicated that decisions were independent of any previously expressed resident views.

Conclusions.—
In this study, surrogates of even the most demented nursing home patients prefer hospital level services including intensive care unit care for the treatment of acute illness. Efforts to control access to services on ethical or economic grounds may meet with resistance.

(Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:1885-1888)

Author Affiliations
From the Medical College of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Drs Cogen and Posner and Mss Cogen and Landsberg); Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia (Ms Patterson); and Department of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pa (Dr Chavin).

Footnotes
Accepted for publication February 12, 1992.

Reprint requests to the Medical College of Pennsylvania, 3300 Henry Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19129 (Dr Cogen).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Dying With Advanced Dementia in the Nursing Home
Mitchell et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:321-326.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Valuing the Outcomes of Treatment: Do Patients and Their Caregivers Agree?
Fried et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2073-2078.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Artificial nutrition and hydration in the patient with advanced dementia: is withholding treatment compatible with traditional Judaism?
Gillick
J. Med. Ethics 2001;27:12-15.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Influence of the Probability of Survival on Patients' Preferences Regarding Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Murphy et al.
NEJM 1994;330:545-549.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT