This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

An Illustration in Rheumatology

Donald A. Redelmeier, MD, FRCPC, MS(HSR), FACP; Kate Lorig, RN, DrPH

Arch Intern Med. 1993;153(11):1337-1342.

Abstract
Objective
To estimate when a difference in disability symptoms is sufficiently large to be important to individual patients.

Design
Cross-sectional analysis of two groups: derivation set (n=46) and validation set (n=57).

Setting
The Arthritis Foundation, Northern California Chapters.

Participants
Volunteer sample of patients with arthritis who live in the community.

Main Outcome Measures
We applied the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire to assess the functional status of individuals. Participants then conductd one-on-one conversations with each other and rated whether their disability was "much better," "somewhat better," "about the same," "somewhat worse," or "much worse" relative to each person they met. For every conversation we calculated the difference between the two participants' health assessment questionnaire scores and linked the difference to the subjective comparison ratings of each individual in the pair.

Results
Health assessment questionnaire score differences were significantly correlated with subjective comparison ratings (correlation coefficient, 41; 95% confidence interval, 0.31 to 0.50). We estimated that health assessment questionnaire scores needed to differ by about 0.19 units for average respondents to stop rating themselves as "about the same" and start rating themselves as "somewhat better" (95% confidence interval, 0.10 to 0.28). Analysis of a second group of patients revealed a similar threshold (mean, 0.23 units; 95% confidence interval, 0.13 to 0.23). In both groups, health assessment questionnaire score differences were imperfect predictors of individual ratings and the threshold for less disabled participants tended to be lower than the threshold for more disabled participants.

Conclusions
Some statistically significant differences in functional status scores may be so small that they represent trivial degrees of symptom relief. An awareness of the smallest difference in symptom scores that is important to patients can provide a rough guide to help clinicians interpret the medical literature.

(Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:1337-1342)

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, and the Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Wellesley Hospital Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario (Dr Redelmeier); and the Department of Medicine, Stanford (Calif) University, and The Stanford Patient Education Research Center (Dr Long).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Experience with rituximab in scleroderma: results from a 1-year, proof-of-principle study
Daoussis et al.
Rheumatology (Oxford) 2009;0:kep093v2-kep093.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F Versus Sulfasalazine in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Randomized Trial
Goldbach-Mansky et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2009;151:229-240.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Minimally Important Difference for the Health Assessment Questionnaire in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Practice Is Smaller Than in Randomized Controlled Trials
POPE et al.
The Journal of Rheumatology 2009;36:254-259.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Validity and responsiveness of the Rehabilitation Activities Profile (RAP) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Verhoef et al.
Clin Rehabil 2008;22:788-800.
ABSTRACT  

Author Response
Rampello and Chetta
ptjournal 2007;87:558-559.
FULL TEXT  

Response to intramuscular methyl prednisolone in inflammatory hand pain: evidence for a targeted clinical, ultrasonographic and therapeutic approach
Karim et al.
Ann Rheum Dis 2007;66:690-692.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sustained benefit in rheumatoid arthritis following one course of rituximab: improvements in physical function over 2 years
Strand et al.
Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006;45:1505-1513.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prognosis in Soft Tissue Disorders of the Shoulder: Predicting Both Change in Disability and Level of Disability After Treatment
Kennedy et al.
ptjournal 2006;86:1013-1032.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physical Therapist Examination, Evaluation, and Intervention Following the Surgical Reconstruction of a Grade III Acromioclavicular Joint Separation
Culp and Romani
ptjournal 2006;86:857-869.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patients with stable long-standing rheumatoid arthritis continue to deteriorate despite intensified treatment with traditional disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs--results of the British Rheumatoid Outcome Study Group randomized controlled clinical trial
Symmons et al.
Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006;45:558-565.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The impact of low family income on self-reported health outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis within a publicly funded health-care environment
Marra et al.
Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004;43:1390-1397.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Why results of clinical trials and observational studies of antitumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy differ: methodological and interpretive issues
Wolfe et al.
Ann Rheum Dis 2004;63:ii13-ii17.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinically important change in quality of life in epilepsy
Wiebe et al.
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2002;73:116-120.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The effects of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs on the Health Assessment Questionnaire score. Lessons from the leflunomide clinical trials database
Scott and Strand
Rheumatology (Oxford) 2002;41:899-909.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Methods to Explain the Clinical Significance of Health Status Measures
Guyatt et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:371-383.
ABSTRACT  

Exercise can reverse quadriceps sensorimotor dysfunction that is associated with rheumatoid arthritis without exacerbating disease activity
Bearne et al.
Rheumatology (Oxford) 2002;41:157-166.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Values for function in rheumatoid arthritis: patients, professionals, and public
Hewlett et al.
Ann Rheum Dis 2001;60:928-933.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical quality management in rheumatoid arthritis: putting theory into practice
Uitz et al.
Rheumatology (Oxford) 2000;39:542-549.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sensitivity Analysis and the Expected Value of Perfect Information
Felli and Hazen
Med Decis Making 1998;18:95-109.
ABSTRACT  

Response criteria for clinical trials in systemic lupus erythematosus
Liang and Fortin
Lupus 1995;4:336-338.