You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 153 No. 16, 23 AUG 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigations
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Do the Medical History and Physical Examination Predict Low Lung Function?

David M. Mannino, MD; Ruth A. Etzel, MD; W. Dana Flanders, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1993;153(16):1892-1897.


Abstract

Background
We sought to determine whether an abnormal respiratory history or chest physical examination could be used to identify men with low lung function.

Methods
We analyzed pulmonary function, physical examination, and questionnaire data from 4461 middle-aged male Vietnam-era army veterans.

Main Results
The study sample consisted of 1161 never smokers, 1292 former smokers, and 2008 current smokers. Clinical indicators of respiratory disease (respiratory symptoms, respiratory signs, or a history of respiratory disease), were present in 26.1% of the never smokers, 31.7% of the former smokers, and 47.2% of the current smokers. We defined low forced expiratory volume in 1 second as a value less than 81.2% of the predicted value. Seven percent of the never smokers, 8% of the former smokers, and 17.3% of the current smokers demonstrated low forced expiratory volume in 1 second. Among those with a clinical indicator for spirometry only 11% of the never smokers, 13% of the former smokers, and 21% of the current smokers actually had a low forced expiratory volume in 1 second. Among those without a clinical indicator 6% of the never smokers, 6% of the former smokers, and 14% of the current smokers actually had a low forced expiratory volume in 1 second.

Conclusions
The use of clinical indicators as a basis for obtaining pulmonary function tests in middle-aged men misses many with low lung function, especially current smokers.

(Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:1892-1897)



Author Affiliations

From the National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Diagnosis and Management of Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians
Qaseem et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2007;147:633-638.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Airway Obstruction Is Common but Unsuspected in Patients Admitted to a General Medicine Service
Zaas et al.
Chest 2004;125:106-111.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Low Lung Function and Incident Lung Cancer in the United States: Data From the First National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Follow-up
Mannino et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:1475-1480.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Paradoxical Movement of the Lateral Rib Margin (Hoover Sign) for Detecting Obstructive Airway Disease*
Garcia-Pachon
Chest 2002;122:651-655.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Obstructive Lung Disease and Low Lung Function in Adults in the United States: Data From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994
Mannino et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:1683-1689.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Scope of the COPD Problem in North America : Early Studies of Prevalence and NHANES III Data: Basis for Early Identification and Intervention
Petty
Chest 2000;117 :326S-331S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does the Clinical Examination Predict Airflow Limitation?
Holleman and Simel
JAMA 1995;273:313-319.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.