You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 153 No. 17, 13 SEP 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Original Investigations
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Correction
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (47)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Elevated Risk of Anaphylactoid Reaction From Radiographic Contrast Media Is Associated With Both β-Blocker Exposure and Cardiovascular Disorders

David M. Lang, MD; Michael B. Alpern, MD; Paul F. Visintainer, PhD; Stephen T. Smith, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1993;153(17):2033-2040.


Abstract



Background
A case-control study, with both retrospective and concurrent subject selection, was performed (1) to determine whether greater risk for anaphylactoid reaction from contrast media associated with β-blocker exposure reflects presence, or is independent of underlying cardiovascular disorder; and (2) to characterize further the risk of anaphylactoid reaction from contrast media in patients with cardiovascular disorders and patients with asthma.

Methods
Adverse reactions from intravenous contrast media were recorded in accordance with quality assurance guidelines. Anaphylactoid reactions were classified as mild to moderate (urticaria/angioedema), severe (stridor, bronchospasm, or hypotension), or major and life-threatening (hypotension with or without the need for subsequent hospitalization). Medical records from reactors were compared with those from matched (gender, age, date, and type of contrast study) controls who received conventional contrast media without adverse reaction.

Results
Of 34 371 intravenous contrast media procedures performed, 122 anaphylactoid reactions were recorded. The risk of anaphylactoid reaction was significantly associated with asthma (odds ratio [OR], 8.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.36 to 32.35; P=.0012). The risk of bronchospasm was associated with β-blocker exposure (OR, 3.73; 95% CI, 1.18 to 11.75; P=.025) and with asthma (OR, 16.39; 95% CI, 4.30 to 62.46; P=.0001). The risk of major and life-threatening reaction was associated with the presence of cardiovascular disorder (OR, 7.71; 95% CI, 1.04 to 57.23; P=.046). Among patients with severe reactions, the risk of hospitalization was elevated by the presence of cardiovascular disorder (P=.001), exposure to β-blockers (OR, 7.67; 95% CI, 1.79 to 32.85; P=.029), or asthma (OR, 20.7; 95% CI, 1.21 to 355.55; P=.065). Although β-blocker exposure and the presence of cardiovascular disorder were highly associated ({chi}2=49, P<.001), a greater risk of bronchospasm with severe reaction was observed in nonasthmatic patients with cardiovascular disorders receiving β-blockers (OR, 15.75; P=.023). Among reactors with asthma, receiving β-blockers, or with a cardiovascular disorder, 60.8% (31/51) experienced severe anaphylactoid reactions, compared with 35.2% (25/71) of patients without these risk factors (OR, 3.62; P=.005).

Conclusions
β-Blocker exposure and cardiovascular disorder are both statistically significant risk factors for severe anaphylactoid reaction from contrast media. Thus, patients receiving β-adrenergic blockers and patients with asthma, on the basis of greater risk for bronchospasm, and patients with cardiovascular disorders, on the basis of elevated risk of major and life-threatening reaction, are appropriate target populations for risk reduction measures before receiving intravenous infusion of contrast media.



Author Affiliations



From the Department of Medicine, Hahnemann University, Philadelphia, Pa (Dr Lang); and the Departments of Radiology (Dr Alpern), Research (Dr Visintainer), and Internal Medicine (Dr Smith), Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich. Dr Visintainer is now with the Graduate School of Health Sciences, New York (NY) Medical College.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Acute serious and fatal reactions to contrast media: our current understanding
Morcos
Br. J. Radiol. 2005;78:686-693.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Multidetector-row computed tomography to detect coronary artery disease: the importance of heart rate
Fishman
Eur Heart J Suppl 2005;7:G4-G12.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.