You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 153 No. 23, 13 DEC 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigations
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (17)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Empiric Long-term Amiodarone Prophylaxis Following Myocardial Infarction

A Meta-Analysis

Dawn G. Zarembski, PharmD; Paul E. Nolan, Jr, PharmD; Marion K. Slack, PhD; Anthony C. Caruso, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1993;153(23):2661-2667.


Abstract

Background
The prophylactic administration of amiodarone following acute myocardial infarction has been investigated in several small trials. This study combined the results of these small trials in a metaanalysis to determine the effects of prophylactic lowdose amiodarone on mortality following acute myocardial infarction.

Methods
Four prospective, randomized, placebocontrolled trials, which investigated the prophylactic administration of low-dose amiodarone (200 to 400 mg/d) to patients after acute myocardial infarction, were selected from the current literature according to strict inclusion criteria. A total of 1140 patients, 566 in the amiodarone-treated group and 574 in the placebo-treated group, were included in the analysis. Sudden cardiac death, cardiac mortality, and total mortality were the end points of interest. In addition, the effect of impaired left ventricular function (ejection fraction, <45%) on total mortality was assessed. Data were aggregated by using the Mantel-Haenszel method to obtain final summary statistics for these end points.

Results
Patients treated with low-dose amiodarone exhibited a lower incidence of sudden cardiac death (3.1%) and total mortality (6.1%) when compared with patients treated with placebo (6.9% and 11.2%, respectively; both P<.01; and 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.011 to 0.065 and 0.013 to 0.082, respectively). There was no significant difference between the amiodarone- and placebo-treated groups with respect to cardiac mortality (2.6% vs 3.7%, respectively; P=.26; and 95% CI, —0.012 to 0.032). For patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 45%, total mortality was 5.5% in the amiodarone-treated group and 9.4% in the placebotreated group (P=.30; CI, —0.023 to 0.101).

Conclusions
Although further data from ongoing large, randomized trials are needed, this meta-analysis suggests that the prophylactic administration of low-dose amiodarone to patients following acute myocardial infarction reduces the incidence of both sudden cardiac death and total mortality. The benefits of low-dose amiodarone may be limited to patients with preserved left ventricular function.

(Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:2661-2667)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy (Drs Zarembski, Nolan, and Slack), Section of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine (Dr Caruso), and University Heart Center (Drs Nolan and Caruso), University of Arizona, Tucson.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Quantitative Overview of Randomized Trials of Amiodarone to Prevent Sudden Cardiac Death
Sim et al.
Circulation 1997;96:2823-2829.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Should Survivors of Myocardial Infarction With Low Ejection Fraction Be Routinely Referred to Arrhythmia Specialists?
Stevenson and Ridker
JAMA 1996;276:481-485.
ABSTRACT  

Recent Advances: Cardiology II: Treatment of heart failure and atrial fibrillation and arrhythmias
McMurray and Rankin
BMJ 1994;309:1631-1635.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.