You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 153 No. 24, 27 DEC 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Review Articles
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (53)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Review of Common Errors in the Indirect Measurement of Blood Pressure

Sphygmomanometry

Richard H. Bailey, MD; John H. Bauer, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1993;153(24):2741-2748.


Abstract



There are three sources of error in the indirect measurement of blood pressure: (1) observer bias, (2) faulty equipment, and (3) failure to standardize the techniques of measurement. This article examines each area extensively, discusses the cumulative effect of these errors on the accuracy of indirect blood pressure measurement, and reviews the recommendations for proper indirect measurement of blood pressure.

(Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:2741-2748)



Author Affiliations



From the Hypertension Section, Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri—Columbia.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Improving the Measurement of Blood Pressure: Is It Time for Regulated Standards?
Appel et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2011;154:838-839.
FULL TEXT  

Measurement of Blood Pressure in the Office: Recognizing the Problem and Proposing the Solution
Myers et al.
Hypertension 2010;55:195-200.
FULL TEXT  

Comparing the Effects of White Coat Hypertension and Sustained Hypertension on Mortality in a UK Primary Care Setting
Dawes et al.
Ann Fam Med 2008;6:390-396.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of exercise versus relaxation on haemoglobin A1C in Black females with type 2 diabetes mellitus
van Rooijen et al.
QJM 2004;97:343-351.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of blood pressure measurements on the bare arm, below a rolled-up sleeve, or over a sleeve
Kahan et al.
Fam Pract 2003;20:730-732.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Discrepancies Between Direct and Indirect Blood Pressure Measurements Using Various Recommendations for Arm Cuff Selection
Clark et al.
Pediatrics 2002;110:920-923.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Are Aneroid Sphygmomanometers Accurate in Hospital and Clinic Settings?
Canzanello et al.
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:729-731.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Measurement of Blood Pressure in Children: Recommendations and Perceptions on Cuff Selection
Arafat and Mattoo
Pediatrics 1999;104:e30-e30.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Variability in Indirect Blood Pressure Measurement
Bottini and Carr
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:1536-1536.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.