This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Physician Attitudes and Practices Regarding Life-Sustaining Treatments and Euthanasia

Terri R. Fried, MD; Michael D. Stein, MD; Patricia S. O'Sullivan, EdD; Dan W. Brock, PhD; Dennis H. Novack, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1993;153(6):722-728.

Abstract
Background
In making decisions about life-sustaining medical interventions, respect for patient autonomy has been widely advocated, yet little is known about what variables may compete with a physician's ability to honor patient requests in clinical situations. We investigated physician attitudes and behaviors about end-of-life decisions by means of a questionnaire that posed five hypothetical scenarios in which an elderly, competent, terminally ill patient made a request that, if agreed to by the physician, could result in the patient's death.

Methods
We surveyed 392 physicians in Rhode Island and asked them to decide (1) whether or not they would comply with a specific patient request, (2) the justifications they used in making their decision, and (3) whether they had been approached with such a request in their clinical practices.

Results
Two hundred fifty-six physicians (65%) responded. Of the respondents, 98% agreed not to intubate the patient in the face of worsening respiratory failure. Eighty-six percent agreed to give the patient a dose of narcotics that could cause respiratory compromise and death to treat his pain adequately. Fifty-nine percent agreed, once the patient was intubated without hope of coming off the respirator, to turn the respirator off. Nine percent agreed to give the patient a prescription for an amount of sleeping pills that would be lethal if taken all at once. Only 1% agreed to give the patient a lethal injection. When they complied with patient requests, physicians cited patient autonomy as the principle most important to their decision making. Physicians who would not comply with patient requests also, paradoxically, often cited this principle but agreed with it less strongly; others cited concerns about the ethical nature of the request, legal questions, and the perception that they were "killing the patient." Sixty-five percent of respondents had been asked by patients to turn off a respirator, and 12% had been asked to administer lethal injections. Twenty-eight percent of respondents indicated that they would comply with requests for lethal injection more frequently if such an action were legal.

Conclusions
Difficult clinical decisions regarding potentially life-prolonging measures are commonly heard in clinical practice. Physicians value the concept of patient autonomy but place it in the context of other ethical and legal concerns and do not always accept specific actions derived from this principle.

(Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:722-728)

Author Affiliations
From the Division of General Internal Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence (Drs Fried, Stein, O'Sullivan, and Novack); and Department of Philosophy, Brown University (Dr Brock).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Opinions concerning euthanasia, life-sustaining treatment and acceleration of death: results of an Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM) survey
Catania et al.
Ann Oncol 2008;19:1947-1954.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Theory and practice of informed consent in the Czech Republic
Krizova and Simek
J. Med. Ethics 2007;33:273-277.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physicians' decisions to withhold and withdraw life-sustaining treatment.
Farber et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:560-564.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Attitudes, Sociodemographic Characteristics, and Actual End-of-Life Decisions of Physicians in Flanders, Belgium
Mortier et al.
Med Decis Making 2003;23:502-510.
ABSTRACT  

Should cancer patients be informed about their diagnosis and prognosis? Future doctors and lawyers differ
Elger and Harding
J. Med. Ethics 2002;28:258-265.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide: A Review of the Empirical Data From the United States
Emanuel
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:142-152.
FULL TEXT  

Physician-Assisted Suicide
Snyder et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2001;135:209-216.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Comparison of Characteristics of Kevorkian Euthanasia Cases and Physician-Assisted Suicides in Oregon
Roscoe et al.
Gerontologist 2001;41:439-446.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Surveys on attitudes to active euthanasia and the difficulty of drawing normative conclusions
Nilstun et al.
Scand J Public Health 2000;28:111-116.
ABSTRACT  

Clinical Problems with the Performance of Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide in the Netherlands
Groenewoud et al.
NEJM 2000;342:551-556.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Changing Attitudes About End-of-Life Decision Making of Medical Students During Third-Year Clinical Clerkships
Hayes et al.
Psychosomatics 1999;40:205-211.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit: Part I: Nelson JE, Meier DE Palliative care in the intensive care unit part I J Intensive Care Med 1999,14 130-139
Nelson and Meier
J Intensive Care Med 1999;14:130-139.
 

Stability of Attitudes Regarding Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia Among Oncology Patients, Physicians, and the General Public
Wolfe et al.
JCO 1999;17:1274-1274.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Practice of Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide in the United States: Adherence to Proposed Safeguards and Effects on Physicians
Emanuel et al.
JAMA 1998;280:507-513.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

What Are the Potential Cost Savings from Legalizing Physician-Assisted Suicide?
Emanuel and Battin
NEJM 1998;339:167-172.
FULL TEXT  

Physician Resource Use and Willingness to Participate in Assisted Suicide
Sulmasy et al.
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:974-978.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physician-Assisted Suicide and Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Disease
Slome et al.
NEJM 1997;336:417-421.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Quinlan Case Revisited
Frader
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1996;21:367-372.
 

The Role of Critical Care Nurses in Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide
Asch
NEJM 1996;334:1374-1379.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia in Washington State: Patient Requests and Physician Responses
Back et al.
JAMA 1996;275:919-925.
ABSTRACT  

Legalizing Assisted Suicide -- Views of Physicians in Oregon
Lee et al.
NEJM 1996;334:310-315.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Oregon's plans to legalise suicide assisted by a doctor
Lee and Tolle
BMJ 1995;310:613-614.
FULL TEXT  

Withdrawal or Withholding of Treatment at the End of Life: Results of a Nationwide Study
Pijnenborg et al.
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:286-292.
ABSTRACT  

Euthanasia: Historical, Ethical, and Empiric Perspectives
Emanuel
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:1890-1901.
ABSTRACT  

Attitudes toward Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia among Physicians in Washington State
Cohen et al.
NEJM 1994;331:89-94.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Willingness to Perform Euthanasia: A Survey of Physician Attitudes
Shapiro et al.
Arch Intern Med 1994;154:575-584.
ABSTRACT