You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 154 No. 15, 8 August 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigations
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (55)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Case Manager Intervention to Reduce Readmissions

John F. Fitzgerald, MD; David M. Smith, MD; Douglas K. Martin, MD; Jay A. Freedman, PhD; Barry P. Katz, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 1994;154(15):1721-1729.


Abstract

Background
Acute hospitalizations represent substantial financial liability to closed health care systems. Among hospitalized patients, those with repeated admissions are high-cost users. Most managed care plans employ case management to control hospital use. This technique attempts to detect and fulfill unmet medical and social needs, intensify postdischarge care, identify and mobilize effective community services, and enhance primary care access. Despite the popularity of case management to control hospital use, few trials have examined its efficacy.

Methods
We conducted a randomized controlled trial of an intervention of case managers at a university-affiliated Veterans Affairs medical center. Six hundred sixty-eight patients aged 45 years or older who were discharged from the general medicine inpatient service, who had access to a telephone, and who received primary care at the hospital's clinics were randomized to the intervention (N=333) and control (N=335) groups. Within 24 hours of discharge, case managers mailed educational materials and access information to intervention patients, and within 5 days they called to review and resolve unmet needs, early warning signs, barriers to keeping appointments, and any readmissions. Case managers contacted intervention patients if they made no visits for 30 days. This resulted in a total of 6260 patient—case manager contacts. Control and intervention patients were followed up for 12 months.

Results
Intervention patients had more frequent visits per patient per month to the general medicine clinic (0.30±0.23 vs 0.26±0.22, P=.008), but we detected no significant differences between groups in nonelective readmissions, readmission days, or total readmissions.

Conclusions
Frequent contacts for education, care, and accessibility by case managers using protocols were ineffective in reducing nonelective readmissions.

(Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:1721-1729)



Author Affiliations

From the Divisions of General Internal Medicine (Drs Fitzgerald, Smith, Martin, and Freedman) and Biostatistics (Dr Katz), Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, the Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Drs Fitzgerald, Smith, Martin, and Freedman), and the Regenstrief Institute for Health Care (Drs Fitzgerald, Smith, and Katz), Indianapolis, Ind.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Meta-Analysis: Secondary Prevention Programs for Patients with Coronary Artery Disease
Clark et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;143:659-672.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Case Management in a Heterogeneous Congestive Heart Failure Population: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Laramee et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:809-817.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Randomised trials of secondary prevention programmes in coronary heart disease: systematic review
McAlister et al.
BMJ 2001;323:957-962.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hospital Readmission Among Long-term Ventilator Patients
Douglas et al.
Chest 2001;120:1278-1286.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Hospital Readmissions as a Measure of Quality of Health Care: Advantages and Limitations
Benbassat and Taragin
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:1074-1081.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of a Home-Based Intervention Among Patients With Congestive Heart Failure Discharged From Acute Hospital Care
Stewart et al.
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:1067-1072.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evidence-Based Disease Management
Ellrodt et al.
JAMA 1997;278:1687-1692.
ABSTRACT  

Electronic Communication With Patients: Evaluation of Distance Medicine Technology
Balas et al.
JAMA 1997;278:152-159.
ABSTRACT  

Randomized Controlled Trial of Residents as Gatekeepers
Meyer et al.
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:2483-2487.
ABSTRACT  

Does Increased Access to Primary Care Reduce Hospital Readmissions?
Weinberger et al.
NEJM 1996;334:1441-1447.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Multidisciplinary Intervention to Prevent the Readmission of Elderly Patients with Congestive Heart Failure
Rich et al.
NEJM 1995;333:1190-1195.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

DO CASE MANAGERS REDUCE READMISSIONS?
JWatch General 1994;1994:4-4.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.