You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 154 No. 21, 14 November 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigations
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Predictors of Survival Following In-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

A Moving Target

Kenneth A. Ballew, MD, MS; John T. Philbrick, MD; Dean E. Caven; John B. Schorling, MD, MPH

Arch Intern Med. 1994;154(21):2426-2432.


Abstract

Background
Counseling patients about the risks and benefits of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) can potentially reduce patient suffering and hospital costs. However, there is currently much disagreement regarding the overall rate of in-hospital CPR survival and characteristics that identify patients more or less likely to survive CPR.

Methods
The charts of all adults who were pulseless and received basic CPR at a 720-bed university hospital during 1990 and 1991 were reviewed. Patients were excluded if cardiac arrest occurred outside the hospital or in the emergency department, operating room, recovery room, or cardiac catheterization laboratory. Each patient's chart was reviewed to determine the presence of explicitly defined clinical characteristics.

Results
Overall, 50 (16.0%) of 313 patients survived to discharge. Before arrest, only impaired functional capacity and sepsis identified patients unlikely to survive CPR. Of adults suffering cardiac arrest during the study period, only 22% underwent CPR, including 13.0% of those with cancer and 18.1% of those 70 years or older.

Conclusions
The use of do-not-resuscitate orders to exclude patients who were inappropriate candidates for CPR may explain why the survival rate reported here is higher than similar reports and why more clinical characteristics were not found to predict CPR survival. Investigators of inhospital CPR should use explicit criteria to describe the conditions studied and report survival for patients who receive basic CPR. The impact of do-not-resuscitate orders on survival rates must be considered. Functional capacity deserves further investigation as a predictor of CPR survival.

(Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:2426-2432)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Improving the Outcome of In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: The Importance of Being EARNEST
Dichtwald et al.
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTH 2009;13:19-30.
ABSTRACT  

Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Treatment, and Prognostication A Consensus Statement From the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (American Heart Association, Australian and New Zealand Council on Resuscitation, European Resuscitation Council, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Council of Asia, and the Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa); the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee; the Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; the Council on Cardiopulmonary, Perioperative, and Critical Care; the Council on Clinical Cardiology; and the Stroke Council
Neumar et al.
Circulation 2008;118:2452-2483.
FULL TEXT  

The ethical and legal implications of deactivating an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in a patient with terminal cancer
England et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2007;33:538-540.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Role of thrombolytic agents in cardiac arrest.
Pedley and Morrison
Emerg. Med. J. 2006;23:747-752.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Critically Ill Neurologic-Neurosurgical Patients
Rabinstein et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79:1391-1395.
ABSTRACT  

A program encouraging early defibrillation results in improved in-hospital resuscitation efficacy
Zafari et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:846-852.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Validation of a Clinical Decision Aid to Discontinue In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitations
van Walraven et al.
JAMA 2001;285:1602-1606.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Derivation of a Clinical Decision Rule for the Discontinuation of In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitations
van Walraven et al.
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:129-134.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of rapid-deployment extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for the resuscitation of pediatric patients with heart disease after cardiac arrest
Duncan et al.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1998;116:305-309.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in the Nursing Home
Zweig
Arch Fam Med 1997;6:424-429.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.