
Microbiology of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia in Persons With and at Risk for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 InfectionImplications for Rational Empiric Antibiotic Therapy
Jeffrey H. Burack, MD, MPP;
Judith A. Hahn, MA;
Dominique Saint-Maurice;
Mark A. Jacobson, MD
Arch Intern Med. 1994;154(22):2589-2596.
Abstract
 |  |
Background Bacterial pneumonia is a very common cause of morbidity and mortality among persons with human immunodeficiency virus; however, the microbiologic characteristics (including antibiotic resistance) of bacterial pathogens causing community-acquired pneumonia in this population have not been well characterized or correlated with potentially predictive clinical presentation characteristics.
Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all adults known to have or to be at high risk for human immunodeficiency virus infection and hospitalized at San Francisco (Calif) General Hospital from May 1990 through April 1991, with a hospital discharge diagnosis of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia and for whom a medical records review confirmed that this diagnosis met a uniform case definition.
Results Two hundred sixteen eligible patients had one or more hospital admissions meeting the case definition. One or more etiologic pathogens were definitively identified in 75% of cases, with Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus species, Staphylococcus aureus, and gram-negative bacilli most frequently identified. In patients who had a bacteriologic diagnosis made, 18.6%, 6.8%, and 4.3% had pneumonia caused by pathogens resistant to ampicillin sodium, cefuroxime sodium, or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, respectively. One hundred percent of pathogens isolated were susceptible to ceftazidime. Anemia and use of antibacterial medication at the time of hospital admission were the only independent predictors of ampicillin and cefuroxime resistance.
Conclusion Nearly one fifth of human immunodeficiency virus—associated community-acquired bacterial pneumonias requiring hospitalization were caused by ampicillin-resistant pathogens, and presenting clinical characteristics did not consistently define a subset of patients at lower risk for resistance. In the absence of a diagnostic sputum Gram's stain and pending definitive microbiologic diagnosis, initial empiric therapy should be with a second- or third-generation cephalosporin or possibly trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.
(Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:2589-2596)
Author Affiliations
From the Departments of Medicine (Drs Burack and Jacobson and Ms Saint-Maurice) and Biostatistics and Epidemiology (Ms Hahn), University of California—San Francisco; and the Medical Service, San Francisco General Hospital (Drs Burack and Jacobson and Ms Saint-Maurice).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Cefepime versus cefotaxime for empirical treatment of bacterial pneumonia in HIV-infected patients: an open, randomized trial
Cordero et al.
J Antimicrob Chemother 2001;48:527-534.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients . Validation of Severity Criteria
CORDERO et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2000;162:2063-2068.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Infections in AIDS: Proceedings of the Sixth Liverpool Tropical School Bayer Symposium on Microbial Diseases held on 6 February 1999
HART et al.
J Med Microbiol 2000;49:947-967.
FULL TEXT
Prevention of Infection Due to Pneumocystis carinii
Fishman
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1998;42:995-1004.
FULL TEXT
|