You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 154 No. 7, 11 April 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Original Investigations
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (24)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Importance of Mammographic Screening Relative to the Treatment of Women With Carcinoma of the Breast

Lawrence J. Solin, MD; Antonio Legorreta, MD, MPH; Delray J. Schultz, PhD; Steven Zatz, MD; Robert L. Goodman, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1994;154(7):745-752.


Abstract



Background
The use of mammographic screening for the early detection of breast cancer has been shown to reduce the mortality from breast cancer. However, the impact of mammographic screening relative to the local treatment of the breast (ie, breast-conservation treatment vs mastectomy) is not well established.

Methods
An analysis was performed of 206 newly diagnosed and treated breast cancers in 201 women identified in 1989 from a health maintenance organization (US Healthcare, Blue Bell, Pa). The 206 breast cancers were evaluated for eligibility for and actual local treatment of the breast with breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation as a function of mammographic screening for the early detection of breast cancer.

Results
Eligibility for local treatment of the breast with breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation was significantly increased for the breast cancers detected in women who had undergone mammographic screening compared with the breast cancers detected in women who had not undergone mammographic screening (88% vs 60%, respectively; P<.0001). For the breast cancers that were eligible on chart review for treatment with breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation, there was no significant difference in the actual local treatment of the breast with breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation for the eligible breast cancers detected in women who had undergone mammographic screening compared with the eligible breast cancers detected in women who had not undergone mammographic screening (44% vs 37%, respectively; P=.40); however, there was a statistically significant difference for the subgroup of women aged 50 years or more (49% vs 21%, respectively; P=.016).

Conclusions
These results show that breast cancers detected in women who had undergone mammographic screening were more likely to be eligible for breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation compared with breast cancers detected in women who had not undergone mammographic screening. For women aged 50 years or more, there was a significant increase in the use of breast-conserving surgery and definitive breast irradiation for eligible breast cancers detected in women who had undergone mammographic screening compared with eligible breast cancers detected in women who had not undergone mammographic screening.

(Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:745-752)



Author Affiliations



From the Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia (Dr Solin); US Healthcare, Blue Bell, Pa (Drs Legorreta, Zatz, and Goodman); and Department of Mathematics, Millersville (Pa) University, and University of Pennsylvania Cancer Center, Philadelphia (Dr Schultz).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Biopsy Methods for Suspicious Mammographic Lesions
Fahy et al.
Arch Surg 2001;136:990-995.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost of Breast Cancer Treatment: A 4-Year Longitudinal Study
Legorreta et al.
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:2197-2201.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.