You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 154 No. 8, 25 April 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Review Article
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (38)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Clinical Issues of Blood Cultures

Pranatharthi H. Chandrasekar, MD; William J. Brown, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1994;154(8):841-849.


Abstract

Dramatic changes in the methods of obtaining blood cultures in clinical practice have recently occurred owing to factors such as the rising number of patients at risk for infection, "newer" pathogens occurring in the bloodstream, widespread use of indwelling intravascular devices, and our improved ability to recover and identify microorganisms in blood. Guidelines for the "proper" practice of obtaining blood cultures are needed. Blood cultures must be obtained under sterile conditions when there is suspicion of bacteremia/ mycobacteremia, fungemia, or viremia. This review provides recent information on optimal blood culture practices during suspected bloodstream infection in hospitalized patients including those with continuous or intermittent bacteremia, patients with intravascular devices, and compromised hosts such as immunodeficient patients and those in intensive care units. The traditional two-bottle system of aerobic and anaerobic cultures continues to be helpful, although the frequency of anaerobic bacteremia has decreased. More recently, special culture/transport media have become available for the recovery of mycobacteria, fungi, and viruses. Communication between the clinician and laboratory personnel frequently aids in improving the yield from blood cultures.

(Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:841-849)



Author Affiliations

From the Infectious Diseases—Hematology/Oncology Liaison Unit, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine (Dr Chandrasekar), and the Departments of Pathology and Immunology/Microbiology (Dr Brown), Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Mich.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Detection of Bloodstream Infections in Adults: How Many Blood Cultures Are Needed?
Lee et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007;45:3546-3548.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Updated Review of Blood Culture Contamination
Hall and Lyman
Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2006;19:788-802.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A simple prediction algorithm for bacteraemia in patients with acute febrile illness
Tokuda et al.
QJM 2005;98:813-820.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Blood Cultures in the Critical Care Unit: Improving Utilization and Yield
Shafazand and Weinacker
Chest 2002;122:1727-1736.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fever in the ICU
Marik
Chest 2000;117:855-869.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Blood Cultures Positive for Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci: Antisepsis, Pseudobacteremia, and Therapy of Patients
Souvenir et al.
J. Clin. Microbiol. 1998;36:1923-1926.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.