 |
|
Screening for Drinking Problems by Patient Self-ReportEven 'Safe' Levels May Indicate a Problem
David G. Buchsbaum, MD, MSHA;
Josie Welsh, MA;
Robin G. Buchanan;
Ronald K. Elswick, Jr, PhD
Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(1):104-108.
Abstract
| |
Background
Physicians often screen their ambulatory patients for serious drinking problems by asking questions related to the quantity of alcohol that they consume. Never previously reported is whether this "quantitative" approach to screening can be used to effectively screen ambulatory patients for the presence of a serious drinking problem.
Methods
The project interviewed 510 patients attending an inner city general medicine practice with the alcohol module of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, revised for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Revised Third Edition. Collected data also included reported quantity, frequency, and recency of drinking. We then calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and receiver operating characteristic curve for zero to two, three to five, six to 11, 12 to 23, and 24 or more standard drinks as reported by 155 patients who reported drinking within 30 days of their visit.
Results
Forty-eight of 155 active drinkers met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Revised Third Edition criteria for alcohol dependence or abuse. Only five patients with an active diagnosis failed to report drinking within 30 days of their visit. The calculated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for reported quantity was 0.81. The sensitivities of reported consumption decline with increasing drinking, while the specificities and positive predictive values rise. The report of drinking between six and 12 drinks per week was associated with a positive predictive value of 0.54 for an active Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Revised Third Edition, diagnosis.
Conclusions
Patient self-report of drinking can be used to screen actively drinking outpatients on the general medicine service for serious drinking problems. Further, in an urban general medicine outpatient population, even federally recommended levels of drinking may indicate a problem. Our data suggest that physicians' recommendations be adjusted for the setting in which they practice.
(Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:104-108)
Author Affiliations
From the Division of General Medicine (Dr Buchsbaum and Mss Welsh and Buchanan), and Department of Biostatistics (Dr Elswick), Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Initial and Maintenance Naltrexone Treatment for Alcohol Dependence Using Primary Care vs Specialty Care: A Nested Sequence of 3 Randomized Trials
O'Malley et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:1695-1704.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Screening for Alcohol Problems in Primary Care: A Systematic Review
Fiellin et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:1977-1989.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
HOW WOULD YOU LABEL YOUR OWN DRINKING PATTERN OVERALL? AN EVALUATION OF ANSWERS PROVIDED BY 181 HIGH FUNCTIONING MIDDLE-AGED MEN
Daeppen et al.
Alcohol Alcohol 1999;34:767-772.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Alcohol Abuse and Dependence in Latinos Living in the United States: Validation of the CAGE (4M) Questions
Saitz et al.
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:718-724.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The AUDIT Alcohol Consumption Questions (AUDIT-C): An Effective Brief Screening Test for Problem Drinking
Bush et al.
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:1789-1795.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Osteoporotic Fracture among Older U.S. Women: Risk Factors Quantified
Turner et al.
J Aging Health 1998;10:372-391.
ABSTRACT
Alcohol Screening Questionnaires in Women: A Critical Review
Bradley et al.
JAMA 1998;280:166-171.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Management of Adults Recovering From Alcohol or Other Drug Problems: Relapse Prevention in Primary Care
Friedmann et al.
JAMA 1998;279:1227-1231.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Patients with Alcohol Problems
O'Connor and Schottenfeld
NEJM 1998;338:592-602.
FULL TEXT
|
