You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 155 No. 12, 26 JUNE 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigations
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Intensive Care Unit and Non—Intensive Care Unit Patients

Immediate and Long-term Survival

Monroe Karetzky, MD; M. Zubair, MD; Jayesh Parikh, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(12):1277-1280.


Abstract

Objective
To determine the effect of location within the hospital and preexisting electrocardiographic rhythm on the outcome of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the cardiopulmonary resuscitation records for a 3-year period, including 668 hospitalized patients, were retrospectively reviewed.

Results
Resuscitation was successful in only 12 patients in the intensive care unit (3.3%) and 43 patients not in the intensive care unit (14.0%), 20 of whom were on a telemetry unit. Patients who survived to discharge had similar 1-year survival rates regardless of initial hospital location, although intensive care unit patients had the best 3-year survival rate, and there were no survivors at 3 years in the group that received cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the nonmonitored hospital bed. Survival was best with an initial cardiac rhythm of ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation, but all non-ventricular tachyarrhythmias were associated with survival. Age was not an apparent factor, while survival to hospital discharge favored whites over blacks.

Conclusions
Futile resuscitative efforts are routinely performed in part because physicians and patients are unaware of outcome results and factors that influence survival. A wider recognition of the limitations of cardiopulmonary resuscitation should lead to advanced directives that reflect this awareness, with substantially more patients choosing not to have cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

(Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:1277-1280)



Author Affiliations

From the Newark Beth Israel Medical Center, New Jersey School of Medicine, and University Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Deconstructing DNR
Gelbman and Gelbman
J. Med. Ethics 2008;34:640-641.
FULL TEXT  

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Critically Ill Neurologic-Neurosurgical Patients
Rabinstein et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79:1391-1395.
ABSTRACT  

The Relationship Between Age and the Use of DNR Orders in Critical Care Patients: Evidence for Age Discrimination
Boyd et al.
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:1821-1826.
ABSTRACT  

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on Television -- Miracles and Misinformation
Diem et al.
NEJM 1996;334:1578-1582.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Survival
Weil et al.
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:215-216.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.