You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 155 No. 13, 10 JULY 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigations
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (59)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Overuse of the Indwelling Urinary Tract Catheter in Hospitalized Medical Patients

Prasoon Jain, MD; Jorge P. Parada, MD; Annette David, MD; Lawrence G. Smith, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(13):1425-1429.


Abstract

Background
The indwelling urinary tract catheter (IUTC) is an important aspect of medical care. We studied the prevalence of the unjustified use of the IUTC in hospitalized medical patients and identified situations associated with its unjustified use.

Methods
This prospective study involved 202 patients admitted to either the medical intensive care unit (n=135) or the medical floors (n=67) of a tertiary care university hospital who were catheterized during the hospital admission. An independent observer assessed the indication of initial catheterization by chart review and interview with the patient and the nurse. The need for continued catheterization was assessed daily by the same observer. The proportion of unjustified IUTC placement was determined using the study guidelines. Complications as a direct consequence of catheter use were recorded.

Results
Of the 202 patients who were studied, the initial indication for the placement of an IUTC was found to be unjustified in 21% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15% to 27%). Continued catheterization was unjustified in 47% (95% CI, 42% to 57%) of 912 patient-days with IUTC studied. In the medical intensive care unit, 64% (95% CI, 58% to 70%) of the total unjustified patientdays with IUTC resulted from its excessively prolonged use for monitoring urine output. Urinary incontinence was found to be the major cause of unjustified initial ([52%] 95% CI, 32% to 74%) and continued ([56%] 95% CI, 50% to 62%) use of IUTC in the noncritical care areas. Catheter—related urinary tract infection requiring intravenous antibiotics or continuous bladder irrigation with amphotericin B was observed in 5% of the patients.

Conclusions
The IUTCs are significantly overused in hospitalized medical patients and careful attention to this aspect of medical care may reduce catheter-related complications by primary prevention.

(Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:1425-1429)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Medicine, State University of New York Health Science Center, Stony Brook.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Reducing Use of Indwelling Urinary Catheters and Associated Urinary Tract Infections
Elpern et al.
Am J Crit Care 2009;18:535-541.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Catheter associated urinary tract infection: what is it, what causes it and how can we prevent it?
Elvy and Colville
British Journal of Infection Control 2009;10:36-41.
ABSTRACT  

Complicated Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections Due to Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis
Jacobsen et al.
Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2008;21:26-59.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nonpayment for Harms Resulting From Medical Care: Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections
Wald and Kramer
JAMA 2007;298:2782-2784.
FULL TEXT  

Prevention of Nosocomial Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections Through Computerized Feedback to Physicians and a Nurse-Directed Protocol
Topal et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2005;20:121-126.
ABSTRACT  

Indwelling Foley Catheters: Is the Current Design a Source of Erroneous Measurement of Urine Output?
Fallis
Crit Care Nurse 2005;25:44-51.
FULL TEXT  

Urinary Catheters: A One-Point Restraint?
Saint et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:238-239.
FULL TEXT  

Hospital-Onset Infections: A Patient Safety Issue
Gerberding
ANN INTERN MED 2002;137:665-670.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Indwelling Urinary Catheters: A One-Point Restraint?
Saint et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2002;137:125-127.
FULL TEXT  

Patients who experience the common but uncomfortable sensation of "needing to void".
Sulzbach
Crit Care Nurse 2002;22:84-87.
FULL TEXT  

Enhancing the Safety of Critically Ill Patients by Reducing Urinary and Central Venous Catheter-related Infections
Saint et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2002;165:1475-1479.
FULL TEXT  

Monitoring Urinary Bladder Temperature in the Intensive Care Unit: State of the Science
Fallis
Am J Crit Care 2002;11:38-45.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nosocomial Urinary Tract Infections And the Indwelling Catheter : What Is New and What Is True?
Kunin
Chest 2001;120:10-12.
FULL TEXT  

Preventing Catheter-Related Bacteriuria: Should We? Can We? How?
Saint and Lipsky
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:800-808.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nosocomial Febrile Illness in the Elderly: Frequency, Causes, and Risk Factors
Trivalle et al.
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:1560-1565.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.