You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 155 No. 14, 24 JULY 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigations
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Terminal Care of the Very Old

Changes in the Way We Die

Katherine A. Hesse, MSW, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(14):1513-1518.


Abstract

Background
This study examines the use of advance directives, limitations of treatment, and medical interventions during the terminal hospitalization of the old-old. Study periods before and after the implementation of the Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990 were chosen to determine if there has been a change in terminal care.

Methods
Chart review was performed for all patients 85 years and older who died in the hospital during 1988 and 1993. Patient characteristics, presence of advance directives, do-not-resuscitate orders, and other treatment limitations were noted as were interventions listed in the Medical Directive.

Results
Less than 12% of the 167 study patients had an advance directive. Length of stay for these terminal admissions decreased from 18.5 to 9.6 days. Ninety-five percent of the patients were "do not resuscitate" by time of death, but orders were written sooner in 1993-75% within 24 hours of admission. Patients with early do-not-resuscitate orders had fewer high-intensity interventions. More patients had "comfort measures only" during the study period. An overall decrease in high-intensity interventions and a specific decrease in the use of transfusions, invasive tests, minor surgery, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation was seen.

Conclusion
Patients 85 years and older are receiving fewer high-intensity interventions during their terminal hospitalizations. More attention is being paid to comfort and few are receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation. There is little reference to formal advance directives in decision making for these patients.

(Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:1513-1518)



Author Affiliations

From Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, Mass.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

End-of-Life Treatment Preferences of Persons With Serious Mental Illness
Foti et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 2005;56:585-591.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation is not addressed in the admitting medical records for the majority of patients who undergo CPR in the hospital
Mirza et al.
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 2005;22:20-25.
ABSTRACT  

Freud's Physician-Assisted Death
McCue and Cohen
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:1521-1525.
FULL TEXT  

Community Physicians Who Provide Terminal Care
Hanson et al.
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:1133-1138.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Death and End-of-Life Planning in One Midwestern Community
Hammes and Rooney
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:383-390.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Acute Care Costs of the Oldest Old: They Cost Less, Their Care Intensity Is Less, and They Go to Nonteaching Hospitals
Perls and Wood
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:754-760.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.