You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 155 No. 16, 11 SEPTEMBER 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigations
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Anaphylaxis

A Review of 266 Cases

Stephen F. Kemp, MD; Richard F. Lockey, MD; Bruce L. Wolf, MD; Phil Lieberman, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(16):1749-1754.


Abstract

Background
A presentation of findings from a large population of anaphylaxis cases.

Methods
Retrospective chart review and follow-up questionnaire provided data on 266 subjects (113 males and 153 females) aged 12 to 75 years (mean age, 38 years) who were referred to a university-affiliated private allergy-immunology practice in Memphis, Tenn, for evaluation and management of anaphylaxis from January 1978 through March 1992.

Results
Of 266 subjects, 162 (61%) had three or more anaphylactic episodes, 41 (15%) had two episodes, and 63 (24%) had one episode. Atopy was present in 98 individuals (37%). Physicians thought foods, spices, and food additives caused anaphylaxis in 89 individuals (34%); crustaceans and peanut accounted for about half of these cases. Medications were thought to have caused the anaphylactic episodes in 52 individuals (20%); nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in about half of these cases. Other probable causes included exercise (n=19), latex (n=2), hormonal changes (n=2), and insect bites (n=4). A suspected cause could not be determined in 98 individuals (37%). These subjects were diagnosed as having idiopathic anaphylaxis. Of the 266 subjects, 102 responded to a follow-up survey; 68 (67%) of the 102 were thought to have identifiable causes of anaphylaxis (32 of whom [47%] failed to carry epinephrine syringes for self-administration despite instructions to do so). In contrast, of 34 subjects with idiopathic anaphylaxis who responded to the survey, only three (9%) did not carry epinephrine.

Conclusions
(1) Atopy is common in subjects who experience anaphylaxis, regardless of its origin; (2) crustaceans and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are the most common food and medication groups, respectively, thought to cause anaphylaxis; (3) causative agents can be identified for two thirds of the subjects, and recurrent attacks are the rule; and (4) subjects with idiopathic anaphylaxis are more likely to carry epinephrine for self-administration than those with identifiable causes.

(Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:1749-1754)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Memphis (Drs Wolf and Lieberman); and the Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Florida College of Medicine and the James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, Tampa (Drs Kemp and Lockey).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Paediatric emergency department anaphylaxis: different patterns from adults
Braganza et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. 2006;91:159-163.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

8 Management of allergy, rashes, and itching
Langran and Laird
Emerg. Med. J. 2004;21:728-741.
FULL TEXT  

Symposium: Pediatric Food Allergy
Sicherer et al.
Pediatrics 2003;111:1591-1594.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Anaphylaxis and Emergency Treatment
Sampson
Pediatrics 2003;111:1601-1608.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Peanut allergy: an overview
Al-Muhsen et al.
CMAJ 2003;168:1279-1285.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Underrepresentation of the Risk and Incidence of Anaphylaxis to Foods
Sicherer et al.
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:2046-2047.
FULL TEXT  

Food-Allergic Reactions in Schools and Preschools
Nowak-Wegrzyn et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001;155:790-795.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Commentary---anaphylactic reactions to paracetamol
Stephenson and Nightingale
Postgrad. Med. J. 2000;76:503-503.
FULL TEXT  

Use Assessment of Self-Administered Epinephrine Among Food-Allergic Children and Pediatricians
Sicherer et al.
Pediatrics 2000;105:359-362.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The gut as target organ for oral immunovaccination with allergen DNA: new hope for patients with anaphylactic reactions to food?
BISCHOFF
Gut 1999;45:11-12.
FULL TEXT  

Food Allergy
Sampson
JAMA 1997;278:1888-1894.
ABSTRACT  

Allergic Reactions to Drugs and Biologic Agents
deShazo and Kemp
JAMA 1997;278:1895-1906.
ABSTRACT  

Aspartame as a Cause of Allergic Reactions, Including Anaphylaxis-Reply
Kemp and Lockey
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:1028-1028.
ABSTRACT  

Aspartame as a Cause of Allergic Reactions, Including Anaphylaxis
Roberts
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:1027-1027.
ABSTRACT  

Learning More about Anaphylaxis
Journal Watch Dermatology 1995;1995:8-8.
FULL TEXT  

Characteristics of Anaphylaxis
Journal Watch Dermatology 1995;1995:16-16.
FULL TEXT  

CHARACTERISTICS OF ANAPHYLAXIS
JWatch General 1995;1995:4-4.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.