You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 155 No. 18, 9 OCTOBER 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigations
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (93)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Perioperative Mortality of Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Surgery

A Clinical Prediction Rule Based on Literature and Individual Patient Data

Ewout W. Steyerberg, MSc; Job Kievit, MD, PhD; J. C. Alexander de Mol Van Otterloo, MD, PhD; J. Hayo van Bockel, MD, PhD; Marinus J. C. Eijkemans, MSc; J. Dik F. Habbema, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(18):1998-2004.


Abstract

Background
Abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery is a major vascular procedure with a considerable risk of (mainly cardiac) mortality.

Objective
To estimate elective perioperative mortality, we developed a clinical prediction rule based on several well-established risk factors: age, gender, a history of myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, ischemia on the electrocardiogram, pulmonary impairment, and renal impairment.

Methods
Two sources of data were used: (1) individual patient data from 246 patients operated on at the University Hospital Leiden (the Netherlands) and (2) studies published in the literature between 1980 and 1994. The Leiden data were analyzed with univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Literature data were pooled with meta-analysis techniques. The clinical prediction rule was based on the pooled odds ratios from the literature, which were adapted by the regression results of the Leiden data.

Results
The strongest adverse risk factors in the literature were congestive heart failure and cardiac ischemia on the electrocardiogram, followed by renal impairment, history of myocardial infarction, pulmonary impairment, and female gender. The literature data further showed that a 10-year increase in age more than doubled surgical risk. In the Leiden data, most multivariate effects were smaller than the univariate effects, which is explained by the positive correlation between the risk factors. In the clinical prediction rule, cardiac, renal, and pulmonary comorbidity are the most important risk factors, while age per se has a moderate effect on mortality.

Conclusions
A readily applicable clinical prediction rule can be based on the combination of literature data and individual patient data. The risk estimates may be useful for clinical decision making in individual patients.

(Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:1998-2004)



Author Affiliations

From the Center for Clinical Decision Sciences, Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Rotterdam (the Netherlands) (Messrs Steyerberg and Eijkemans and Dr Habbema); and Department of Surgery, University Hospital Leiden (the Netherlands) (Drs Kievit, de Mol Van Otterloo, and van Bockel).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

A 66-Year-Old Man With an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Review of Screening and Treatment
Schermerhorn
JAMA 2009;302:2015-2022.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Impact of Individualized Evidence-Based Decision Support on Aneurysm Patients' Decision Making, Ideals of Autonomy, and Quality of Life
Stiggelbout et al.
Med Decis Making 2008;28:751-762.
ABSTRACT  

Clinical Decision Making for Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Al-Omran et al.
Circulation 2004;110:e517-e523.
FULL TEXT  

Small Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Powell and Greenhalgh
NEJM 2003;348:1895-1901.
FULL TEXT  

Validation of Two Risk Models for Perioperative Mortality in Patients Undergoing Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Surgery
Kertai et al.
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURG 2003;37:13-21.
ABSTRACT  

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Cost-effectiveness of Elective Endovascular and Open Surgical Repair
Bosch et al.
Radiology 2002;225:337-344.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

{beta}-Blockers and Reduction of Cardiac Events in Noncardiac Surgery: Scientific Review
Auerbach and Goldman
JAMA 2002;287:1435-1444.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving the quality of surgeons' treatment decisions: a comparison of clinical decision making with a computerised evidence based decision analytical model
Timmermans et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2001;10:4-9.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Lack of Influence of Gender on Outcomes of Mechanically Ventilated Medical ICU Patients
Epstein and Vuong
Chest 1999;116:732-739.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A 75-Year-Old Woman With an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm and Emphysema
Goldman
JAMA 1998;280:366-372.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.