You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 155 No. 19, 23 OCTOBER 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigations
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Epidemiology of Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders

Disparity by Age, Diagnosis, Gender, Race, and Functional Impairment

Neil S. Wenger, MD, MPH; Marjorie L. Pearson, PhD, MSHS; Katherine A. Desmond, MS; Ellen R. Harrison, MS; Lisa V. Rubenstein, MD, MSPH; William H. Rogers, PhD; Katherine L. Kahn, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(19):2056-2062.


Abstract

Background
The relationship of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders to patient and hospital characteristics has not been well characterized.

Methods
This observational study of a nationally representative sample of 14 008 Medicare patients hospitalized with congestive heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, pneumonia, cerebrovascular accident, or hip fracture evaluated the relationship of DNR orders to patient sickness at admission, functional impairment, age, disease, race, gender, preadmission residence, insurance status, and hospital characteristics.

Results
Of the 14 008 patients, DNR orders were assigned to 11.6%. Patients with greater sickness at admission and functional impairment received more DNR orders (P<.001) but even among patients in the sickest quartile (with a 65% chance of death within 180 days), only 31% received DNR orders. The DNR orders were assigned more often to older patients after adjustment for sickness at admission and functional impairment (P<.001), and DNR order rates differed by diagnosis (P<.001). After adjustment for patient and hospital characteristics, DNR orders were assigned more often to women and patients with dementia or incontinence and were assigned less often to black patients, patients with Medicaid insurance, and patients in rural hospitals.

Conclusions
Do-not-resuscitate orders are assigned more often to sicker patients but may be underused even among the most sick. Sickness at admission and functional impairment do not explain the increase in DNR orders with age or the disparity across diagnosis. Further evaluation is needed into whether variation in DNR order rates with age, diagnosis, race, gender, insurance status, and rural location represents differences in patient preferences or care compromising patient autonomy.

(Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:2056-2062)



Author Affiliations

From the Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif (Drs Wenger and Kahn); Health Program of RAND, Santa Monica, Calif (Drs Pearson, Rubenstein, Rogers, and Kahn and Mss Desmond and Harrison); and Department of Medicine, Sepulveda (Calif) Veterans Affairs/UCLA (Dr Rubenstein).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Racial Differences in Survival After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Chan et al.
JAMA 2009;302:1195-1201.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Epidemiologic Study of In-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Elderly
Ehlenbach et al.
NEJM 2009;361:22-31.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Advance Care Planning Among Patients With Cancer: Impact of Terminal Illness Acknowledgment, Religiousness, and Treatment Preferences
Smith et al.
JCO 2008;26:4131-4137.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The do-not-resuscitate order: associations with advance directives, physician specialty and documentation of discussion 15 years after the Patient Self-Determination Act
Morrell et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2008;34:642-647.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

What Accounts for Differences or Disparities in Pediatric Palliative and End-of-Life Care? A Systematic Review Focusing on Possible Multilevel Mechanisms
Linton and Feudtner
Pediatrics 2008;122:574-582.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Decisions to Withhold Life Support on Prolonged Survival
Chen et al.
Chest 2008;133:1312-1318.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

"Allow natural death" versus "do not resuscitate": three words that can change a life
Venneman et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2008;34:2-6.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Lack of Ethnic Differences in End-of-Life Care in the Veterans Health Administration
Fischer et al.
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 2007;24:277-283.
ABSTRACT  

Prevalence of Patients With Do-Not-Resuscitate Status on Acute Geriatric Wards in Flanders, Belgium
De Gendt et al.
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2007;62:395-400.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Process of care and mortality of stroke patients with and without a do not resuscitate order in the West Midlands, UK
Mohammed et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2006;18:102-106.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Current Research Findings on End-of-Life Decision Making Among Racially or Ethnically Diverse Groups
Kwak and Haley
Gerontologist 2005;45:634-641.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Regional and Institutional Variation in the Initiation of Early Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders
Zingmond and Wenger
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:1705-1712.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Electronic Screening of Dictated Reports to Identify Patients with Do-Not-Resuscitate Status
Aronsky et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2004;11:403-409.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Quality of Care Plans for Patients With Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders
Sulmasy et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1573-1578.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in Patients Hospitalized With Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Worcester Heart Attack Study
Jackson et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:776-783.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of Religiosity on Patients' Perceptions of Do-Not-Resuscitate Status
Sullivan et al.
Psychosomatics 2004;45:119-128.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ethical Issues in Geriatrics: A Guide for Clinicians
Mueller et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79:554-562.
ABSTRACT  

Evaluation of do not resuscitate orders (DNR) in a Swiss community hospital
Junod Perron et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2002;28:364-367.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Increasing use of DNR orders in the elderly worldwide: whose choice is it?
Cherniack
J. Med. Ethics 2002;28:303-307.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

End-of-Life Issues and the Do-Not-Resuscitate Order : Who Gives The Order and What Influences the Decision?
Karnik
Chest 2002;121:683-686.
FULL TEXT  

The Attitudes of Black Americans Toward Advance Directives
Dupree
J Transcult Nurs 2000;11:12-18.
ABSTRACT  

Factors Associated With Use of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Seriously Ill Hospitalized Adults
Goodlin et al.
JAMA 1999;282:2333-2339.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The epidemiology of gender-discrepant Illness
Gabriel
Lupus 1999;8:339-345.
 

Variation in the Use of Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in Patients With Stroke
Shepardson et al.
Arch Intern Med 1997;157:1841-1847.
ABSTRACT  

Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders in the Elderly: Age Discrimination or Patient Preference?
Rosenfeld and Wenger
Arch Intern Med 1997;157:1041-1043.
ABSTRACT  

Publications in Subspecialty Journals on End-of-Life Ethics
Heffner et al.
Arch Intern Med 1997;157:685-690.
ABSTRACT  

Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders: Is There Really Disparity by Diagnosis?
Romano
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:2497-2497.
ABSTRACT  

Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders: Is There Really Disparity by Diagnosis?-Reply
Wenger and Kahn
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:2497-2498.
ABSTRACT  

Outcomes of Patients With Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders: Toward an Understanding of What Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders Mean and How They Affect Patients
Wenger et al.
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:2063-2068.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.