You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 155 No. 20, 13 NOVEMBER 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Special Article
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Kenneth R. DeVault, MD; Donald O. Castell, MD; Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology; Eugene M. Bozymski, MD; James L. Achord, MD; Patrick G. Brady, MD; W. Scott Brooks, MD; Frank L. Lanza, MD; Carol A. Lee, MD; David T. Lyon, MD; George W. Meyer, MD; John F. Reinus, MD; Marvin M. Schuster, MD; Patrick Waring, MD; Paul Yeaton, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(20):2165-2173.


Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disorder that affects all segments of the population. These guidelines have been prepared to suggest the preferable, but not only, approaches to the management of a patient with GERD. The physician must be free to choose the course best suited to the individual patient. The world literature was reviewed and the guidelines were developed under the auspices of the American College of Gastroenterology, and approved by other gastroenterology societies. Diagnostic recommendations include the following: (1) general approach to GERD, including empiric therapy, (2) appropriate mucosal evaluation (ie, endoscopy and radiology), (3) use of pH and provocative testing, and (4) indications for manometric evaluation. Therapeutic recommendations include the following: (1) general approach to therapy including lifestyle changes, (2) use of acid suppression, (3) use of promotility drugs, (4) maintenance treatment of GERD, and (5) indications for antireflux surgery.

(Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:2165-2173)



Author Affiliations

(Chair), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; Jackson, Miss; Tampa, Fla; Atlanta, Ga; Houston, Tex; Rancho Cordova, Calif; Schenectady, NY; Atlanta; New York, NY; Baltimore, Md; Atlanta; Charlottesville, Va

From the Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla (Dr DeVault); The Graduate Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (Dr Castell); and the Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology, Arlington, Va. A complete listing of the members of the Practice Parameters Committee can be found in the "Acknowledgment" section.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Prevalence of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Patients With Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Lung Disease
Koh et al.
Chest 2007;131:1825-1830.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prognostic influence of Barrett's oesophagus and Helicobacter pylori infection on healing of erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) and symptom resolution in non-erosive GORD: report from the ProGORD study
Malfertheiner et al.
Gut 2005;54:746-751.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Increased gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in patients with severe COPD
Casanova et al.
Eur Respir J 2004;23:841-845.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A 59-Year-Old Woman With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Barrett Esophagus
Spechler
JAMA 2003;289:466-475.
FULL TEXT  

Endocinch therapy for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a one year prospective follow up
Mahmood et al.
Gut 2003;52:34-39.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Functional heartburn: the stimulus, the pain, and the brain
Fass and Tougas
Gut 2002;51:885-892.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relationships Between Authors of Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Pharmaceutical Industry
Choudhry et al.
JAMA 2002;287:612-617.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Survey of Primary Care Physicians' Approach to Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Elderly Patients
Wilcox et al.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2001;56:M514-M517.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevalence of Upper Respiratory Symptoms in Patients with Symptomatic Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
THEODOROPOULOS et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2001;164:72-76.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical and Humanistic Outcomes in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Converted From Omeprazole to Lansoprazole
Nelson et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2491-2496.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Prevalence of Gastroesophageal Reflux in Asthma Patients without Reflux Symptoms
HARDING et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2000;162:34-39.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Efficacy of Omeprazole for the Treatment of Symptomatic Acid Reflux Disease Without Esophagitis
Richter et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:1810-1816.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

An evidence-based approach to the management of uninvestigated dyspepsia in the era of Helicobacter pylori
van Zanten et al.
CMAJ 2000;162:s3-23.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cost analysis of a provincial drug program to guide the treatment of upper gastrointestinal disorders
Bursey et al.
CMAJ 2000;162:817-823.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

24-h Esophageal pH Testing in Asthmatics: Respiratory Symptom Correlation with Esophageal Acid Events
Harding et al.
Chest 1999;115:654-659.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.