You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 155 No. 21, 27 NOVEMBER 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigations
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Influence of Clinical Risk Factors on the Use of Angiography and Revascularization After Acute Myocardial Infarction

John A. Spertus, MD, MPH; Noel S. Weiss, MD, DrPH; Nathan R. Every, MD, MPH; W. Douglas Weaver, MD; Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project Investigators

Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(21):2309-2316.


Abstract

Background
Coronary revascularization provides the greatest survival advantage in those patients with the greatest mortality risk. This study examines the relationship between variables that predict mortality and the use of angiography and revascularization after acute myocardial infarction.

Methods
Study of 4823 survivors of acute myocardial infarction, who underwent angiography between 6 hours and 5 days of admission, to determine the relationship between factors that predict mortality and the use of angiography (n=2274), angioplasty (n=692), and bypass surgery (n=469).

Results
Except for recurrent angina, clinical factors that predict higher mortality were associated with a lower use of angiography (the multivariable adjusted odds ratio was 0.47 for older age, 0.85 for a history of infarction, 0.50 for patients not receiving thrombolytic medications, 0.64 for new heart failure, and 2.75 for recurrent angina [P<.001 for all factors]). A similar relationship was observed among patients selected for angioplasty (the odds ratio was 0.51 for an ejection fraction of <40%, 0.72 for those patients not receiving thrombolytic medications, 0.74 for a history of infarction, and 1.94 for recurrent angina [P<.001 for all factors]). In contrast, patients with unfavorable prognostic profiles were much more likely to undergo coronary bypass surgery (the odds ratio was 1.46 for recurrent angina, 1.28 for older age groups, 2.23 for new heart failure, 1.28 for patients not receiving thrombolytic medications, and 1.46 for a history of infarction [P<.001 for all factors]).

Conclusions
These data suggest that aside from symptoms of recurrent angina, the use of angiography and angioplasty is not driven by mortality risk stratification. In contrast, bypass surgery is preferentially performed in patients at increased risk for mortality.

(Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:2309-2316)



Author Affiliations

From the Northwest Health Services Research and Development Field Program, Seattle Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Dr Spertus); and Departments of Medicine/Cardiology (Drs Spertus, Every, and Weaver) and Epidemiology (Dr Weiss), University of Washington, Seattle.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Vision and Creation of the American Heart Association Pharmaceutical Roundtable Outcomes Research Centers
Peterson et al.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2009;2:663-670.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Understanding Physicians' Risk Stratification of Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the Canadian ACS 2 Registry
Yan et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:372-378.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Translating Evidence Into Practice: Are We Neglecting the Neediest?
Spertus and Furman
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:987-988.
FULL TEXT  

Regionalization and the Underuse of Angiography in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System as Compared with a Fee-for-Service System
Petersen et al.
NEJM 2003;348:2209-2217.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Availability of on-site catheterization and clinical outcomes in patients receiving fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction
Llevadot et al.
Eur Heart J 2001;22:2104-2115.
ABSTRACT  

Validated risk stratification model accurately predicts low risk in patients with unstable angina
Calvin et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:1803-1808.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A comparison of U.S. and Canadian cardiac catheterization practices in detecting severe coronary artery disease after myocardial infarction: efficiency, yield and long-term implications
Batchelor et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:12-19.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions
Scanlon et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33:1756-1824.
FULL TEXT  

Admission to Hospitals With On-Site Cardiac Catheterization Facilities : Impact on Long-Term Costs and Outcomes
Krumholz et al.
Circulation 1998;98:2010-2016.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Determinants of the Use of Coronary Angiography and Revascularization after Thrombolysis for Acute Myocardial Infarction
Pilote et al.
NEJM 1996;335:1198-1205.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.