You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 155 No. 21, 27 NOVEMBER 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Original Investigations
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Gender Differences in Device Therapy for Malignant Ventricular Arrhythmias

Heather L. Horton, MD, PhD; Roger A. Marinchak, MD; Seth J. Rials, MD, PhD; Peter R. Kowey, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(21):2342-2345.


Abstract



Background
Several recent reports have suggested a gender bias in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. It is not clear whether this is true in the treatment of malignant ventricular arrhythmias.

Objectives
To perform a retrospective chart review of 130 patients evaluated for malignant ventricular arrhythmias between July 1990 and June 1992. To compare baseline cardiovascular and clinical parameters and treatment modalities, including cardioverter-defibrillator implantation rates, between women and men.

Results
There was no significant difference in the percentage of women and men who were advised to have cardioverter-defibrillator implantation (61% vs 53%) or who underwent cardioverter-defibrillator implantation (46% vs 52%). Women had a lower incidence of coronary artery disease than men (61% vs 85%, P<.01), a lower incidence of myocardial infarction (46% vs 75%, P<.01), and a higher mean left ventricular ejection fraction (38% vs 32%, P=.02). Of patients with indications for cardioverter-defibrillator implantation, significantly more women refused a device than men (19% vs 2%, P=.01), and significantly more women were considered medically ineligible for cardioverter-defibrillator implantation despite having less severe heart disease as a group (12% vs 0%, P=.04). This resulted in significantly fewer women receiving a defibrillator than men with similar indications (18 of 26 women vs 47 of 48 men, P<.01). Of patients who received defibrillators, significantly more women received investigational devices (50%) than men (21%) (P<.05) (35% of women and 19% of men with indication for cardioverter-defibrillator implantation). Inhospital mortality was low in both groups (women, 0%; men, 4%). The 30-month mortality in patients with indications for device intervention was similar in both groups (women, 21%; men, 19%).

Conclusions
No evidence of difference was found between women and men in the rates of recommendation for, or implantation of, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Women refused device implantation more often than men, and they may be considered medically ineligible for device implantation more than men. This combination results in fewer women with medical indications for cardioverter-defibrillator implantation receiving defibrillators than men. This difference does not appear to be associated with increased short-term mortality.

(Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:2342-2345)



Author Affiliations



From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Lankenau Hospital and Medical Research Center, Wynnewood, Pa (Drs Horton, Marinchak, Rials, and Kowey), and the Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (Drs Marinchak, Rials, and Kowey).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.