You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 155 No. 3, 13 FEBRUARY 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigations
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (45)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Detecting Delirium Among Hospitalized Older Patients

Peter Pompei, MD; Marquis Foreman, RN, PhD; Christine K. Cassel, MD; Cathy Alessi, MD; Deon Cox, DO

Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(3):301-307.


Abstract

Background
Delirium occurs commonly among older hospitalized patients and is frequently not recognized. In an effort to identify tools useful to clinicians in the diagnosis of delirium, test characteristics of four screening instruments were compared.

Methods
Patients 65 years of age or older who were admitted to one of four medical and surgical wards of a university teaching hospital were followed up prospectively. Potential subjects were excluded if unavailable for interviews or discharged within 48 hours of admission, or if judged too impaired to participate in the daily interviews. Research assistants administered four instruments used to detect delirium: Digit Span Test, Vigilance 'A' Test, Clinical Assessment of Confusion, and Confusion Assessment Method. Abnormal scores on these tests or suspicion of acute confusion prompted a referral to the clinician-investigators who then assessed the patient daily for delirium based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disor- ders, Revised Third Edition criteria.

Results
Delirium occurred in 64 (14.8%) of 432 subjects. The positive likelihood ratios for all of the instruments were significantly more than 1. The instruments remained useful when applied to selected subgroups: subjects in whom acute mental status changes were documented, subjects on surgical services, and subjects with impaired cognitive status on admission. Combinations of any two instruments did not perform substantially better than the instrument with the best test characteristics: the Clinical Assessment of Confusion. All instruments were more useful at confirming delirium than in excluding it.

Conclusion
The four instruments studied, which are suitable for use at the bedside, can aid the clinician in identifying patients likely to be suffering from delirium.

(Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:301-307)



Author Affiliations

From The University of Chicago (Ill). Dr Pompei is now with the Stanford (Calif) University School of Medicine.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Performance of the Clock Drawing Test in Elderly Medical Inpatients: Does It Have Utility in the Identification of Delirium?
Adamis et al.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2005;18:129-133.
ABSTRACT  

Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis and Other Hydration Parameters as Risk Factors for Delirium in Rural Nursing Home Residents
Culp et al.
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2004;59:M813-M817.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Delirium: A Call to Improve Current Standards of Care
Flaherty and Morley
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2004;59:M341-M343.
FULL TEXT  

Delirium Symptoms and Low Dietary Intake in Older Inpatients Are Independent Predictors of Institutionalization: A 1-Year Prospective Population-Based Study
Bourdel-Marchasson et al.
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 2004;59:M350-M354.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Delirium in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: Validity and Reliability of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU)
Ely et al.
JAMA 2001;286:2703-2710.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Diagnosis and Management of Delirium near the End of Life
Casarett et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2001;135:32-40.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Changing Clinical Practice through Research: The Case of Delirium
Lacko et al.
Clin Nurs Res 1999;8:235-250.
ABSTRACT  

Importance of Serum Anticholinergic Activity in the Assessment of Elderly Patients with Delirium
Mussi et al.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 1999;12:82-86.
ABSTRACT  

Misdiagnosing Delirium as Depression in Medically Ill Elderly Patients
Farrell and Ganzini
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:2459-2464.
ABSTRACT  

Delirium, DRGs, and Documentation
Kirkland
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:2355-2355.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.