This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (54)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Clive Kearon, MB, PhD; Jack Hirsh, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(4):366-372.

Abstract
A large proportion of hospitalized patients who are at high risk for venous thrombo-embolism (VTE) do not receive prophylaxis. Reluctance to use VTE prophylaxis in surgical patients may be due to fear of perioperative bleeding when anticoagulants are given preoperatively. We preformed a literature review to determine (1) whether prophylaxis for VTE is effective when it is started postoperatively and (2) the relative efficacy of preoperatively and postoperatively initiated prophylaxis. Studies were included in the review (1) if they were randomized trials with "blind" assessment of appropriate VTE outcomes, and (2) if prophylaxis was started postoperatively. Randomized, controlled trials establish that pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic methods of prophylaxis that are effective when started preoperatively are also effective when they are started postoperatively, with relative risks for VTE of 0.16 to 0.49. Low rates of VTE in noncontrolled randomized trials that included postoperatively intitiated prophylactic regimens support this finding. The relative efficacy of preoperatively and postoperatively initiated VTE prophylaxis could not be determined definitively, as direct comparisons of the same regimens have not been performed. Indirect comparisons suggest that any loss of efficacy resulting from deferring VTE prophylaxis until after surgery is unlikely to be marked. Randomized trials are required to resolve this question. This comparison may be of greatest clinical importance when twice-daily, low-molecular-weight heparin is used to prevent VTE after major orthopedic surgery.

(Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:366-372)

Author Affiliations
From McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, and Hamilton (Ontario) Civic Hospitals Research Center.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy
Geerts et al.
Chest 2004;126:338S-400S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Timing of Initial Administration of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Prophylaxis Against Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patients Following Elective Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
Hull et al.
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:1952-1960.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism
Geerts et al.
Chest 2001;119 :132S-175S.
FULL TEXT  

Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Prophylaxis Using Dalteparin in Close Proximity to Surgery vs Warfarin in Hip Arthroplasty Patients: A Double-blind, Randomized Comparison
Hull et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2199-2207.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Preoperative vs Postoperative Initiation of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Prophylaxis Against Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Undergoing Elective Hip Replacement
Hull et al.
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:137-141.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism after major trauma
Verstraete
Trauma 1999;1:39-51.
ABSTRACT  

Prophylaxis of Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism: Current Recommendations
Hull and Pineo
CLIN APPL THROMB HEMOST 1998;4:96-104.
ABSTRACT