You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 155 No. 6, 27 MARCH 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigations
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (50)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Enhancing Physician Adoption of Practice Guidelines

Dissemination of Influenza Vaccination Guideline Using a Small-Group Consensus Process

Jurgis Karuza, PhD; Evan Calkins, MD; John Feather, PhD; Charles O. Hershey, MD; Leonard Katz, MD; Barbara Majeroni, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(6):625-632.


Abstract

Background
A dissemination intervention to facilitate adoption of a preventive practice guideline (influenza vaccination for older adults) in group practices was developed and evaluated. The intervention, small-group consensus process, started with a physician expert presenting the guideline and followed with the group participating in a structured discussion of ways to implement the guideline that culminated in a public commitment (ie, "buy in") to adopt the guideline.

Methods
Thirteen group practices and their primary care physicians (mean size, 5) were assigned randomly to intervention or control arms. In each group practice, physicians in the intervention arm met for 1 hour. Control physicians participated in an unrelated discussion (nonsteroidal drug use). Guideline adoption was determined by changes in physicians' vaccination rates that were obtained through prechart and postchart reviews of 51 physicians. Prequestionnaires and postquestionnaires measured influenza knowledge and prevention attitudes.

Results
Using analysis of covariance, the small-group consensus process was found to increase physician vaccination rates by 34% compared with the control arm (F (1,48)=19.49). All intervention arm physicians increased vaccination rates from before to after compared with 54% of control arm physicians. Attitudes and knowledge did not change and were unrelated to increased vaccination rates.

Conclusions
A case is made for the small-group consensus process as an effective utilization-focused dissemination method. Interventions based on group dynamics and sensitive to local practice contexts can be useful in facilitating adoption of guidelines by physicians in group practices.

(Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:625-632)



Author Affiliations

From the Western New York Geriatric Education Center (Drs Karuza, Calkins, and Feather), Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology (Drs Karuza and Calkins), Department of Medicine (Drs Karuza, Calkins, Feather, and Hershey), Primary Care Resource Center (Dr Feather), Department of Family Medicine (Drs Calkins and Majeroni), State University of New York—Buffalo; State University College at Buffalo (Dr Karuza); and Health Care Plan, Buffalo (Drs Calkins and Katz).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Working together: a qualitative study of effective group formation amongst GPs during a cost-driven prescribing initiative
Walker and Mathers
Fam Pract 2004;21:552-558.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Effect of Education, Feedback, and Provider Prompts on the Rate of Missed Vaccine Opportunities in a Community Health Center
Sabnis et al.
CLIN PEDIATR 2003;42:147-151.
ABSTRACT  

Promoting influenza vaccination of elderly patients in primary care
Humair et al.
Fam Pract 2002;19:383-389.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Interventions That Increase Use of Adult Immunization and Cancer Screening Services: A Meta-Analysis
Stone et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2002;136:641-651.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evaluating Quality of Care for Patients With Heart Failure
Krumholz et al.
Circulation 2000;101 :e122-e140.
FULL TEXT  

Guidelines in Pulmonary Medicine: A 25-Year Profile
Hackner et al.
Chest 1999;116:1046-1062.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Confidential prescriber feedback and education to improve antibiotic use in primary care: a controlled trial
Hux et al.
CMAJ 1999;161:388-392.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving Immunization Rates in Private Pediatric Practices Through Physician Leadership
Sinn et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1999;153:597-603.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessing Immunization Performance of Private Practitioners in Maine: Impact of the Assessment, Feedback, Incentives, and Exchange Strategy
Massoudi et al.
Pediatrics 1999;103:1218-1223.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical Practice Guidelines: Should Social Work Develop Them?
Howard and Jenson
Research on Social Work Practice 1999;9:283-301.
ABSTRACT  

Interrater Agreement Among Psychiatrists in Psychiatric Emergency Assessments
Way et al.
Am. J. Psychiatry 1998;155:1423-1428.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Getting research findings into practice: Barriers and bridges to evidence based clinical practice
Haynes and Haines
BMJ 1998;317:273-276.
FULL TEXT  

Improving Care Near the End of Life: Why Is It So Hard?
Lo
JAMA 1995;274:1634-1636.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.