 |
 |

Improving Compliance With Breast Cancer Screening in Older WomenResults of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Carla J. Herman, MD, MPH;
Theodore Speroff, PhD;
Randall D. Cebul, MD
Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(7):717-722.
Abstract
Background To compare three approaches for improving compliance with breast cancer screening in older
Methods Randomized controlled trial using three parallel group practices at a public hospital. Subjects included women aged 65 years and older (n=803) who were seen by residents (n=66) attending the ambulatory clinic from October 1, 1989, through March 31, 1990. All provider groups received intensive education in breast cancer screening. The control group received no further intervention. Staff in the second group offered education to patients at their visit. In addition, flowsheets were used in the "Prevention Team" group and staff had their tasks redefined to facilitate compli
Results Medical records were reviewed to determine documented offering/receipt of clinical breast examination and mammography. A subgroup of women without previous clinical breast examination (n=540) and without previous mammography (n=471) were analyzed to determine the effect of the intervention. During the intervention period, women without a previous clinical breast examination were offered an examination significantly more often in the Prevention Team group than in the control group, adjusting for age, race, and comorbidity and for physicians' gender and training level. The patients in the Prevention Team group were offered clinical breast examination (31.5%) more frequently than those in the patient education or control groups, but this was not significant after adjusting for the above covariates. Likewise, mammography was offered more frequently to patients in the Prevention Team and in the patient education group than to patients in the control group, after adjusting for the factors above using logistic regression.
Conclusions The results provide support for patient education and organizational changes that involve nonphysician personnel to enhance breast cancer screening among older women, particularly those without previous screening.
(Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:717-722)
Author Affiliations
From the Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, University Hospitals of Cleveland (Dr Herman); Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine at MetroHealth Medical Center (Drs Speroff and Cebul) and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Drs Speroff and Cebul), Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio. Dr Herman is now with the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
CiteULike Connotea Delicious Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Organizational Factors and the Cancer Screening Process
Anhang Price et al.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2010;2010:38-57.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Patient and Clinical Site Factors Associated With Rescreening Behavior Among Older Multiethnic, Low-Income Women
Fox et al.
The Gerontologist 2004;44:76-84.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
A Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess the Benefit of Offering On-Site Mobile Mammography in Addition to Health Education for Older Women
Reuben et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2002;179:1509-1514.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Interventions That Increase Use of Adult Immunization and Cancer Screening Services: A Meta-Analysis
Stone et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2002;136:641-651.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Health Promotion and Preventive Measures: Interpreting Messages at Midlife
Meadows et al.
Qual Health Res 2001;11:450-463.
ABSTRACT
Implementation of Outreach Telephone Counseling to Promote Mammography Participation
Ludman et al.
Health Educ Behav 1999;26:689-702.
ABSTRACT
Effectiveness of Interventions Designed to Increase Mammography Use: A Meta-Analysis of Provider-targeted Strategies
Mandelblatt and Yabroff
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 1999;8:759-767.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Enhancing Mammography Use in the Inner City: A Randomized Trial of Intensive Case Management
Weber and Reilly
Arch Intern Med 1997;157:2345-2349.
ABSTRACT
|