You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 155 No. 9, 8 MAY 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigations
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

The Impact of Family History on Ovarian Cancer Risk

The Utah Population Database

Richard A. Kerber, PhD; Martha L. Slattery, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 1995;155(9):905-912.


Abstract

Objective
To estimate the relative risks and population attributable risks of ovarian cancer associated with family histories of cancer at several sites.

Methods
A matched case-control analytic study (662 cases, 2647 controls), employing the Utah Population Database, a genealogy of approximately 1 million individuals linked to cancer incidence data from the Utah Cancer Registry. Family history was assessed using kinship order and a kinship-weighted familial standardized incidence ratio statistic.

Results
Family histories of ovarian, uterine, breast, and pancreatic cancer were significantly associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer. The relative risk of ovarian cancer was 4.31 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.35 to 7.90) for women with a first-degree relative with ovarian cancer, 2.12 (95% CI, 1.19 to 3.78) for women with an affected second-degree relative, and 1.48 (95% CI, 0.98 to 2.24) for women with an affected third-degree relative. The odds ratio (OR) was 2.06 (95% CI, 1.44 to 2.93) for those with the highest familial standardized incidence ratio. No age differences were observed between cases with and without a family history of ovarian cancer. There was substantial heterogeneity of family history effects by cell type. Increased parity was not protective among women with a strong family history of cancer at the sites studied (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.38 to 3.26), although it was protective among women without a family history of these cancers (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.62).

Conclusions
The risk of ovarian cancer was substantially increased among women with family histories of ovarian, uterine, pancreatic, and, to a lesser degree, breast cancer. Among women with family histories of any of these cancers, the risk of ovarian cancer is not diminished by high parity.

(Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:905-912)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Tea Consumption and Ovarian Cancer Risk: A Case-Control Study in China
Zhang et al.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11:713-718.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fortnightly review: Hereditary ovarian carcinoma
Kasprzak et al.
BMJ 1999;318:786-789.
FULL TEXT  

Hereditary Factors in Gynecologic Cancer
Lynch et al.
The Oncologist 1998;3:319-338.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

FAMILY HISTORY AND OVARIAN CANCER
JWatch General 1995;1995:4-4.
FULL TEXT  

Should a Family History Be Taken From Every Woman With Ovarian Cancer?
Narod
Arch Intern Med 1995;155:893-894.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.