You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 156 No. 1, 8 JANUARY 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigations
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (32)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Contaminated Stethoscopes Revisited

Melinda A. Smith, MPH; John J. Mathewson, PhD; I. Alan Ulert, MD; Ernesto G. Scerpella, MD; Charles D. Ericsson, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(1):82-84.


Abstract

Background
Because of their universal use by medical professionals, stethoscopes can be a source of nosocomial infections.

Objective
To determine the frequency of contamination of stethoscopes with bacteria and fungi.

Methods
Cultures were obtained from 200 stethoscopes from four area hospitals and outpatient clinics in Houston, Tex. The frequency of stethoscope contamination in different groups of hospital personnel and medical settings was determined. We also measured the frequency of antimicrobial resistance of the staphylococcal strains that were isolated.

Results
One hundred fifty-nine (80%) of the 200 stethoscopes surveyed were contaminated with microorganisms. The majority of organisms that were isolated were gram-positive bacteria, primarily Staphylococcus species. Fifty-eight percent of the Staphylococcus species that were isolated, including four (17%) of 24 Staphylococcus aureus isolates, were resistant to methicillin. Physicians' stethoscopes were contaminated more often than those of other medical personnel groups (P=.02). Stethoscopes used only in designated areas were contaminated less frequently than stethoscopes belonging to individual medical personnel (P=.01). Although stethoscopes were contaminated in all areas, stethoscopes from the pediatric medical setting were contaminated less frequently than those from other hospital areas (P=.009).

Conclusions
Stethoscope use may be important in the spread of infectious agents, including antimicrobialresistant strains, and strategies to reduce the contamination of stethoscopes should be developed. We recommend disinfection of stethoscopes or regular use of disposable stethoscope covers.

(Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:82-84)



Author Affiliations

From the Center for Infectious Diseases, University of Texas at Houston.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Computer Bugs
Dubik and Barton
AAP Grand Rounds 2006;16:22-23.
FULL TEXT  

Contamination of computer keyboards in clinical areas: potential reservoir for nosocomial spread of organisms
Waghorn et al.
British Journal of Infection Control 2005;6:22-24.
ABSTRACT  

Stethoscopes: a study of contamination and the effectiveness of disinfection procedures
Waghorn et al.
British Journal of Infection Control 2005;6:15-17.
ABSTRACT  

The Stethoscope: A Potential Source of Nosocomial Infection?
Marinella et al.
Arch Intern Med 1997;157:786-790.
ABSTRACT  

Stethoscopes as a Source of Staph
Journal Watch Cardiology 1996;1996:19-19.
FULL TEXT  

STETHOSCOPES AS A SOURCE OF STAPH
JWatch General 1996;1996:7-7.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.