You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 156 No. 11, 10 JUNE 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (38)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Cholesterol-Lowering Intervention Program

Effect of the Step I Diet in Community Office Practices

Arlene W. Caggiula, PhD; Joan E. Watson, PhD; Lewis H. Kuller, MD; Marian B. Olson, MS; N. Carole Milas, MS; Michelle Berry, MS; Janet Germanowski, MSN

Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(11):1205-1213.


Abstract



Background
A randomized study was conducted to test the feasibility of cholesterol lowering in physician office practices using the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel I guidelines.

Methods
Twenty-two physician practices in phase 1 and 23 in phase 2 were recruited from communities in Western Pennsylvania and West Virginia. These physicians treated a total of 450 adults in phase 1 (190 men and 260 women) and 480 adults in phase 2 (184 men and 296 women) with hypercholesterolemia. Three models (Usual Care [phase 1], Office Assisted [phase 2], and Nutrition Center [phase 2]) for implementing the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel I guidelines were tested over an 18-month period. The baseline serum cholesterol levels were as follows: 6.51 mmol/L (252 mg/dL) in the Usual Care Model; 6.80 mmol/L (262 mg/dL) in the Office Assisted Model; and 6.96 mmol/L (269 mg/dL) in the Nutrition Center Model.

Results
In the patients who were not taking lipidlowering medication, the mean cholesterol response was significantly different between the 3 models (P<.01). Serum cholesterol levels declined by 0.14 mmol/L (5.4 mg/dL) in the Usual Care Model; by 0.31 mmol/L (12 mg/dL) in the Office Assisted Model; and by 0.54 mmol/L (20.9 mg/dL) in the Nutrition Center Model. Two factors—length of time to follow-up measurement and change in weight—were independently related to cholesterol response across all models. African Americans demonstrated a significantly smaller response than whites in the Usual Care Model, while men demonstrated greater declines in serum cholesterol levels than women in the Office Assisted Model. Patient satisfaction was very favorable in both enhanced conditions; however, those treated in the the Nutrition Center Model were more satisfied (P<.05) with program components.

Conclusions
The impact of nutrition intervention delivered through physician practices on serum cholesterol levels is less than clinically desirable, and new approaches with more aggressive therapy should be tested and implemented.

(Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1205-1213)



Author Affiliations



From the Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa (Drs Caggiula, Watson, and Kuller and Mss Olson, Milas, Berry, and Germanowski), and West Virginia University School of Nursing, Morgantown (Dr Watson).


Footnotes



The 2 primary authors (Drs Caggiula and Watson) are listed alphabetically, as their contribution to the study and to the preparation of the manuscript was equal.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Nutritional counselling in primary health care: a randomized comparison of an intervention by general practitioner or dietician
Willaing et al.
European Journal of Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation 2004;11:513-520.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relative efficacy of differential methods of dietary advice: a systematic review
Thompson et al.
Am J Clin Nutr 2003;77:1052S-1057.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

REAP and WAVE: New Tools to Rapidly Assess/Discuss Nutrition with Patients
Gans et al.
J. Nutr. 2003;133:556S-562.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evidence-Based Nutrition Principles and Recommendations for the Treatment and Prevention of Diabetes and Related Complications
Franz et al.
Diabetes Care 2002;25:148-198.
FULL TEXT  

Development of a case-based integrated nutrition curriculum for medical students
Hark and Morrison
Am J Clin Nutr 2000;72:890S-897S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cholesterol-lowering effects of psyllium intake adjunctive to diet therapy in men and women with hypercholesterolemia: meta-analysis of 8 controlled trials1
Anderson et al.
Am J Clin Nutr 2000;71:472-479.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Psyllium-Enriched Cereals Lower Blood Total Cholesterol and LDL Cholesterol, but Not HDL Cholesterol, in Hypercholesterolemic Adults: Results of a Meta-Analysis
Olson et al.
J. Nutr. 1997;127:1973-1980.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

When to Start Cholesterol-Lowering Therapy in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association Task Force on Risk Reduction
Grundy et al.
Circulation 1997;95:1683-1685.
FULL TEXT  

Nutritional Counseling in Community Office Practices
Ford and Sciamanna
Arch Intern Med 1997;157:361-362.
ABSTRACT  

NUTRITION COUNSELING OFTEN INADEQUATE FOR LOWERING CHOLESTEROL
JWatch General 1996;1996:7-7.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.