You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 156 No. 11, 10 JUNE 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Marked Improvement in Recognition and Completion of Health Care Proxies

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Counseling by Hospital Patient Representatives

Diane E. Meier, MD; Barbara R. Fuss, MA; Donna O'Rourke, MS; Shari A. Baskin, MPH; Moshe Lewis, MPH; R. Sean Morrison, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(11):1227-1232.


Abstract

Background
Advance directives provide a means for patients to retain influence on their medical care should decisional capacity be lost. Several studies have now demonstrated that advance directives that are completed in the ambulatory care setting are rarely available and recognized when patients are admitted to the acute care hospital.

Objective
To evaluate a generalizable model for improving recognition of previously completed advance directives and for promoting appointment of health care proxies in hospitalized patients.

Methods
Hospitalized elderly patients were randomly assigned to receive the intervention or usual care (n=190). Intervention patients with capacity were counseled by hospital patient representatives about advance directives and encouraged to complete health care proxies. Patients with existing proxies had this information noted in their charts. For patients without capacity, counselors reviewed their charts for proxy documentation and if absent, contacted patients' next of kin and private physicians to determine proxy status. Usual care patients were not contacted by patient representatives.

Results
Forty-eight percent of intervention patients completed a new proxy or had a previously completed proxy identified compared with 6% of controls (P<.001). For patients with capacity, 22% of intervention patients had a previously appointed proxy agent identified compared with 6% of controls (P<.001). Thirty-six percent of intervention patients appointed a proxy decision maker compared with 0% of controls (P<.02). For patients without capacity, 31% of intervention patients had previously appointed proxies identified compared with 6% of controls (P<.001).

Conclusions
Counseling by hospital patient representatives is an effective and generalizable means of improving recognition and execution of advance directives in the acute care hospital.

(Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1227-1232)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Geriatrics and Adult Development, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Role of advance directives in palliative care units: a prospective study
Pautex et al.
Palliat Med 2008;22:835-841.
ABSTRACT  

Completion of Advance Directives: Do Social Work Preadmission Interviews Make a Difference?
Johnson and Stadel
Research on Social Work Practice 2007;17:686-696.
ABSTRACT  

The Effectiveness of Interventions to Increase Advance Directive Completion Rates
Jezewski et al.
J Aging Health 2007;19:519-536.
ABSTRACT  

Improving the Use of Hospice Services in Nursing Homes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Casarett et al.
JAMA 2005;294:211-217.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improvements in Advance Care Planning in the Veterans Affairs System: Results of a Multifaceted Intervention
Pearlman et al.
Arch Intern Med 2005;165:667-674.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

High Rates of Advance Care Planning in New York City's Elderly Population
Morrison and Meier
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:2421-2426.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Resuscitating Advance Directives
Lo and Steinbrook
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:1501-1506.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Which primary care resident is more likely to initiate the discussion of designating a healthcare proxy?
Eloi-Stiven et al.
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 2004;21:111-115.
ABSTRACT  

Communicating End-of-Life Preferences
McDonald et al.
West J Nurs Res 2003;25:652-666.
ABSTRACT  

Ethics and Dying at Home
Ratner and Song
Home Health Care Management Practice 2003;15:123-125.
ABSTRACT  

The Wendland Case -- Withdrawing Life Support from Incompetent Patients Who Are Not Terminally Ill
Lo et al.
NEJM 2002;346:1489-1493.
FULL TEXT  

Systematic Implementation of an Advance Directive Program in Nursing Homes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Molloy et al.
JAMA 2000;283:1437-1444.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impediments to Writing Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders
Eliasson et al.
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:2213-2218.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit: Part I: Nelson JE, Meier DE Palliative care in the intensive care unit part I J Intensive Care Med 1999,14 130-139
Nelson and Meier
J Intensive Care Med 1999;14:130-139.
 

A New Model of Advance Care Planning: Observations From People With HIV
Martin et al.
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:86-92.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Barriers to Completion of Health Care Proxies: An Examination of Ethnic Differences
Morrison et al.
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:2493-2497.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.