You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 156 No. 12, June 24, 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

See one, do one, teach one? House staff experience discussing do-not-resuscitate orders

J. A. Tulsky, M. A. Chesney and B. Lo
Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, University of California, San Francisco, USA.

BACKGROUND: Medical residents commonly discuss resuscitation decisions with hospitalized patients. Previous studies suggest that the quality of these discussions is poor. OBJECTIVE: To learn about residents' experience with do-not-resuscitate (DNR) discussions and their attitudes toward them. METHODS: Medical house officers on the wards of three teaching hospitals were eligible to participate. A subset had previously audiotaped actual DNR discussions as part of a study that described the quality of discussions. In a self-administered questionnaire, house officers rated their performance conducting a recent DNR discussion, stated their attitudes, and described their experience learning to talk to patients about these issues. RESULTS: One hundred one (88%) of 115 residents responded to the survey. Eighty-six (90%) of 96 stated they had done a good job with the discussion and 78 (77%) of 101 reported feeling comfortable discussing the topic with patients. Ninety-four (94%) of 100 residents said they discuss code status with all seriously ill patients and while on the medical wards they conduct a median of one DNR discussion per week. On average, they had observed four discussions conducted by more senior clinicians. One third of the residents had never been observed talking to patients about DNR decisions and 71% had been observed two or fewer times. CONCLUSIONS: These findings help explain the observations about the quality of DNR discussions. House staff "see" and "do" these discussions, but are not taught through observation and feedback. We recommend that communication about end-of-life treatment decisions be treated as a medical skill to be taught with the same rigor as other clinical procedures.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Truth-telling in discussing prognosis in advanced life-limiting illnesses: a systematic review
Hancock et al.
Palliat Med 2007;21:507-517.
ABSTRACT  

NEGOTIATING A "GOOD DEATH": WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT AMERICAN HOSPITALS
Molnar
Gerontologist 2007;47:565-568.
FULL TEXT  

Do-not-resuscitate decision: the attitudes of medical and non-medical students
Sham et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2007;33:261-265.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Efficacy of Communication Skills Training for Giving Bad News and Discussing Transitions to Palliative Care
Back et al.
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:453-460.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Studying communication in oncologist-patient encounters: The SCOPE Trial
Koropchak et al.
Palliat Med 2006;20:813-819.
ABSTRACT  

Decisions at the end of life: an empirical study on the involvement, legal understanding and ethical views of preregistration house officers.
Schildmann et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2006;32:567-570.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Resident Approaches to Advance Care Planning on the Day of Hospital Admission.
Smith et al.
Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1597-1602.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patient-doctor communication and the importance of clarifying end-of-life decisions
Magauran and Brennan
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 2005;22:335-336.
 

Evidence of improved knowledge and skills after an elective rotation in a hospice and palliative care program for internal medicine residents
von Gunten et al.
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 2005;22:195-203.
ABSTRACT  

Determining resuscitation preferences of elderly inpatients: a review of the literature
Frank et al.
CMAJ 2003;169:795-799.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Meaning and Agency in Discussing End-of-Life Care: A Study of Elderly Veterans' Values and Interpretations
Young et al.
Qual Health Res 2003;13:1039-1062.
ABSTRACT  

Discussing Do-Not-Resuscitate Status
von Gunten
JCO 2003;21:20s-25.
FULL TEXT  

Do Specialists Differ on Do-Not-Resuscitate Decisions?
Kelly et al.
Chest 2002;121:957-963.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Enhancing Physician-Patient Communication
Lee et al.
ASH Education Book 2002;2002:464-483.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Discussing Do-Not-Resuscitate Status
von Gunten
JCO 2001;19:1576-1581.
FULL TEXT  

Serving Patients Who May Die Soon and Their Families: The Role of Hospice and Other Services
Lynn
JAMA 2001;285:925-932.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Discussions of "code status" on a family practice teaching ward: What barriers do family physicians face?
Calam et al.
CMAJ 2000;163:1255-1259.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Facing Requests for Physician-Assisted Suicide: Toward a Practical and Principled Clinical Skill Set
Emanuel
JAMA 1998;280:643-647.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.