You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 156 No. 13, 8 JULY 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Recurrent Pneumococcal Bacteremia

A Warning of Immunodeficiency

Marta Rodríguez-Créixems, MD; Patricia Muñoz, MD; Eugenia Miranda, MD; Teresa Peláez, PharmD, PhD; Roberto Alonso, BD, PhD; Emilio Bouza, MD, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(13):1429-1434.


Abstract

Background
Recurrent pneumococcal infections are known to occur occasionally in patients with profound immune defects. We performed a case-control analysis of recurrent pneumococcal bacteremias.

Patients and Methods
The 547 episodes of Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteremia detected from January 1, 1985, to December 31, 1994, were reviewed. We selected all cases with more than 1 episode separated by 30 days or more ("cases") and compared each of them with 2 controls (patients with single episodes of pneumococcal bacteremia).

Results
Fifteen patients (2.8%) had 31 episodes of pneumococcal bacteremia. Except for multiple myeloma (P<.02), the underlying disease was remarkably similar among patients with single and recurrent episodes of pneumococcal bacteremia. However, among patients positive for human immunodeficiency virus infection, those who had recurrences were at a more advanced stage of their disease than those who did not. The presence of an ultimately fatal underlying condition was more frequent in case patients (P<.001). Overall, 47% of the patients with recurrences died during their second episode of pneumococcal bacteremia.

Conclusions
Our data suggest that recurrence is more than anecdotal in patients with bacteremic infections caused by S pneumoniae (2.8%). We believe that recurrence is a warning sign of immunodeficiency. Patients with multiple myeloma, human immunodeficiency virus infection, solid organ tumors, and chronic liver disease with bacteremic pneumococcal infections should be offered antipneumococcal vaccine and other potentially preventive measures, despite doubts about their efficacy. This is justified by the high mortality rate associated with recurrent episodes (47%).

Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1429-1434



Author Affiliations

From the Division of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases—HIV, "Gregorio Marañón" General Hospital, University of Madrid (Spain).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

IRAK4 and NEMO mutations in otherwise healthy children with recurrent invasive pneumococcal disease
Ku et al.
J. Med. Genet. 2007;44:16-23.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Changes in the Epidemiology of Pneumococcal Bacteremia in a Swiss University Hospital During a 15-Year Period, 1986-2000
Trampuz et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79:604-612.
ABSTRACT  

Recurrent Pneumococcal Bacteremia: Risk Factors and Outcomes
Turett et al.
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:2141-2144.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.