You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 156 No. 13, 8 JULY 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (17)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Development and Implementation of Cost-effective Guidelines in the Laboratory Investigation of Diarrhea in a Community Hospital

Yoginder K. Chitkara, MD; Kathleen A. McCasland, SM(ASCP), MBA; Leo Kenefic, SM(ASCP)

Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(13):1445-1448.


Abstract

Background
Fecal cultures are often inappropriately requested in the investigation of diarrhea.

Objectives
To develop and determine the efficacy of practice guidelines for the ordering and processing of stool cultures that are submitted for the diagnosis of community-acquired diarrhea.

Methods
The results of stool cultures that were submitted to the microbiology laboratory of a tertiary care nonteaching community hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Following the implementation of guidelines, the efficacy was evaluated by comparison of fecal culture results in a prospective manner.

Results
Analysis of results of stool cultures that were obtained from 3072 patients during a 3-year period revealed that (1) the sensitivity (40%) and predictive value (20%) of finding neutrophils in smear preparations were too low to be clinically useful, (2) routine cultures from patients with nosocomial diarrhea were uniformly negative, and (3) multiple specimens from a patient rarely provided additional information. Based on these findings, new guidelines were developed and implemented with the cooperation of clinical staff. Three-month follow-up results showed that the total number of specimens, the number of specimens from patients with nosocomial diarrhea, and multiple specimens declined by 37.7%, 70.6%, and 50%, respectively. However, the isolation rate of pathogens increased from 11.7% to 18.7%.

Conclusions
The application of practice guidelines that include elimination of smear examination of rectal swabs, exclusion of routine cultures from patients with nosocomial diarrhea, and rejection of repeated cultures can result in significant cost savings without adversely affecting patient care.

Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1445-1448



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Laboratory Medicine, Carondelet St Mary's Hospital, Tucson, Ariz.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Avoiding laboratory pitfalls in infectious diseases
Lo and Smego
Postgrad. Med. J. 2004;80:660-662.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Derivation and Validation of Guidelines for Stool Cultures for Enteropathogenic Bacteria Other Than Clostridium difficile in Hospitalized Adults
Bauer et al.
JAMA 2001;285:313-319.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Do We Know What Inappropriate Laboratory Utilization Is?: A Systematic Review of Laboratory Clinical Audits
van Walraven and Naylor
JAMA 1998;280:550-558.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

DIARRHEA AND STOOL CULTURES
JWatch General 1996;1996:7-7.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.