You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 156 No. 14, 22 JULY 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (77)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Computer Reminders to Implement Preventive Care Guidelines for Hospitalized Patients

J. Marc Overhage, MD, PhD; William M. Tierney, MD; Clement J. McDonald, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(14):1551-1556.


Abstract



Background
Hospitalizations are an opportunity to provide preventive care.

Objective
To determine if computer reminders, which we have shown to be effective in our ambulatory care setting, increase the provision of inpatient preventive care.

Methods
Randomized, controlled trial on the general medicine inpatient service of an urban, university-affiliated public hospital. Study subjects were 78 house staff rotating on the 6 general medicine services. The intervention was reminders to physicians printed on daily rounds reports about preventive care for which their patients were eligible, and suggested orders for preventive care provided through the physicians' workstations. The preventive care guidelines were derived from the US Preventive Care Task Force recommendations. Compliance with preventive care guidelines and house staff attitudes toward providing preventive care to hospitalized patients were the main outcome measures.

Results
No significant differences were seen between intervention and control physicians in compliance with preventive care guidelines in the aggregate or when individual preventive care actions were analyzed. This was true even though most physicians endorsed providing most kinds of preventive care for hospitalized patients.

Conclusions
Despite past success in increasing preventive care in the outpatient setting, we were unable, using a moderately intensive intervention, to increase the provision of preventive care during hospitalizations. The physicians providing care during the hospitalization were not the patients' primary care physicians, which proved to be an important barrier. More intensive interventions, or more direct linkages between inpatient and outpatient care providers, may be required to overcome this resistance.

Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1551-1556



Author Affiliations



From the Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, and the Regenstrief Institute for Health Care (Drs Overhage, Tierney, and McDonald) and the Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Dr Tierney), Indianapolis.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The effectiveness of integrated health information technologies across the phases of medication management: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials
McKibbon et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012;19:22-30.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of point-of-care computer reminders on physician behaviour: a systematic review
Shojania et al.
CMAJ 2010;182:E216-E225.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Implementation of proven interventions in general medical inpatients: development and evaluation of a new quality indicator for drug therapy
Huang et al.
BMJQS 2008;17:269-274.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Patients Derogate Physicians Who Use a Computer-Assisted Diagnostic Aid
Arkes et al.
Med Decis Making 2007;27:189-202.
ABSTRACT  

Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care
Chaudhry et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2006;144:742-752.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Integrating "Best of Care" Protocols into Clinicians' Workflow via Care Provider Order Entry: Impact on Quality-of-Care Indicators for Acute Myocardial Infarction
Ozdas et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006;13:188-196.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving the ICU: Part 2
Garland
Chest 2005;127:2165-2179.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Practitioner Performance and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review
Garg et al.
JAMA 2005;293:1223-1238.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of an Evidence-Based Computerized Decision Support System on Primary Care Prescription Costs
McMullin et al.
Ann Fam Med 2004;2:494-498.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: From Evidence to Application: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy
Schunemann et al.
Chest 2004;126:688S-696S.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Computer Physician Order Entry: Benefits, Costs, and Issues
Kuperman and Gibson
ANN INTERN MED 2003;139:31-39.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Risk Stratification and Comorbidity
Ferraris and Ferraris
Card Surg Adult 2003;2:187-224.
FULL TEXT  

Update in Hospital Medicine
Flansbaum and Huddleston
ANN INTERN MED 2002;137:814-822.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nurse Practitioners and Preventive Screening in the Hospital
Kelley et al.
Clin Nurs Res 2002;11:433-449.
ABSTRACT  

Design and Analysis of Controlled Trials in Naturally Clustered Environments: Implications for Medical Informatics
Chuang et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002;9:230-238.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Forecasting the Impact of a Clinical Practice Guideline for Perioperative {beta}-Blockers to Reduce Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality
Schmidt et al.
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:63-69.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Clinical practice guidelines in unstable angina improve clinical outcomes by assuring early intensive medical treatment
Iliadis et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1689-1695.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Computer-based Guideline Implementation Systems: A Systematic Review of Functionality and Effectiveness
Shiffman et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 1999;6:104-114.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Measuring the Effects of Reminders for Outpatient Influenza Immunizations at the Point of Clinical Opportunity
Tang et al.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 1999;6:115-121.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Strategies To Increase Detection of Hemochromatosis
McDonnell et al.
ANN INTERN MED 1998;129:987-992.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of Computer-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems on Physician Performance and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review
Hunt et al.
JAMA 1998;280:1339-1346.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Online Practice Guidelines: Issues, Obstacles, and Future Prospects
Zielstorff
J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998;5:227-236.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.