You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 156 No. 15, 12 AUGUST 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (29)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Ketorolac vs Chlorpromazine in the Treatment of Acute Migraine Without Aura

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Trial

Mahesh Shrestha, MD; Rajeev Singh, MD; Jody Moreden, MD; James E. Hayes, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(15):1725-1728.


Abstract



Background
Many treatments for acute migraine exist. Chlorpromazine is effective but has serious side effects. Ketorolac has only rare side effects.

Objective
To compare intramuscular ketorolac tromethamine with intravenous chlorpromazine hydrochloride in treating acute migraine.

Methods
We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial comparing the clinical effectiveness of 60 mg of intramuscular ketorolac tromethamine with 25 mg of intravenous chlorpromazine hydrochloride in patients with acute migraine headache seen in the emergency department. Pain intensity, quantitated using the Wong-Baker Faces Rating Scale, was measured every 30 minutes for 2 hours in the emergency department. Patients returned pain scores at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours by mail.

Results
Fifteen patients were entered into each treatment arm. No differences were seen between the mean pain scores or the mean change in pain scores. The ketorolac group mean (±SEM) pain score decreased from 4.07±0.18 to 0.73±0.3 in 2 hours. The chlorpromazine group pain score decreased from 4.47±0.17 to 0.87±0.4. Two of the 3 nonresponders responded to the alternate group's treatment. No side effects were seen.

Conclusion
Using 60 mg of intramuscular ketorolac tromethamine is as effective as 25 mg of intravenous chlorpromazine hydrochloride in the treatment of acute migraine headache. Patients who do not respond to one of these medications may respond to the other.

Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1725-1728



Author Affiliations



From the Divisions of Emergency Medicine (Drs Shrestha, Moreden, and Hayes) and General Internal Medicine (Drs Shrestha and Singh), the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Chlorpromazine in migraine
Loga and Lewis
Emerg. Med. J. 2007;24:297-300.
FULL TEXT  

Acute migraine treatment with droperidol: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Silberstein et al.
Neurology 2003;60:315-321.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Migraine: pharmacotherapy in the emergency department
Kelly
Emerg. Med. J. 2000;17:241-245.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.