You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 156 No. 15, 12 AUGUST 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Involvement of Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Programs in Advance Directive Education

John E. Heffner, MD; Celia Barbieri, MS

Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(15):1746-1751.


Abstract

Background
Cardiac rehabilitation programs represent opportunities to educate patients with cardiac disease about living wills and durable powers of attorney for health care. The extent of advance directive education that is currently provided in cardiac rehabilitation programs, however, is unknown.

Methods
A questionnaire was mailed to nonphysician directors of cardiac rehabilitation programs to determine the programs' involvement in educating enrollees about end-of-life issues and the directors' opinions regarding the appropriateness of such education in cardiac rehabilitation curricula. Data were presented as proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results
Of the 1013 cardiac rehabilitation program directors, 845 (83%) responded to the questionnaire, of which 48 stated they were no longer enrolling patients. Of the remaining 797 program directors (83%), 71% (95% CI, 67%-74%) informed patients of their prognosis, but only 18% (95% CI, 15%-20%) and 12% (95% CI, 9%-14%) asked patients if they had a living will or a durable power of attorney for health care, respectively. Only 9% (95% CI, 7%-11%) offered educational sessions on advance directives and 17% distributed advance directive informational material. Education about cardiopulmonary resuscitation was provided by 27% (95% CI, 23%-30%), but only 3% (95% CI, 2%-4%) provided information on do-not-resuscitate topics. Fifty percent (95% CI, 46%-53%) were in favor of including advance directive education and 49% (95% CI, 45%-52%) favored inclusion of do-not-resuscitate topics into curricula.

Conclusions
Cardiac rehabilitation programs are potentially valuable but not widely used sites for educating patients with cardiac disease about advance directives.

Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1746-1751



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

End-of-Life Care Preferences of Patients Enrolled in Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Programs
Heffner and Barbieri
Chest 2000;117:1474-1481.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.