You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 156 No. 17, 23 SEPTEMBER 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (37)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Blood Pressure

Assessment of Interarm Differences

Adam J. Singer, MD; Judd E. Hollander, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(17):2005-2008.


Abstract



Background
Although a large interarm blood pressure difference is assumed to help identify patients with aortic dissection, the degree of normal interarm blood pressure variation has not been well defined.

Methods
To determine the normal variation in bilateral upper-extremity blood pressure measurements, we conducted a prospective observational study on a convenience sample of ambulatory patients who were seen at a university hospital emergency department. Bilateral upper-extremity blood pressure measurements were performed with an automated blood pressure monitor at the time the patient was seen. Clinical and demographic data collected included age, sex, race, medical history, chief complaint, cardiac risk factors, pulse, bilateral blood pressure measurements, and discharge diagnosis. The primary outcome measures were the interarm blood pressure differences.

Results
Of 610 patients, 324 (53%) had a systolic or a diastolic interarm blood pressure difference of more than 10 mm Hg, and 113 (19%) had a systolic or a diastolic interarm blood pressure difference of more than 20 mm Hg. The variation in interarm blood pressure measurements was unrelated to age, gender, race, mean arterial pressure, cardiovascular risk factors, or discharge diagnosis. The mean interarm systolic blood pressure difference was significantly greater in patients with known coronary artery disease (14.5 vs 10.4 mm Hg; P=.05, Student t test).

Conclusion
Bilateral upper-extremity blood pressure determinations, as measured by automated indirect measurement, have a wide degree of interarm variation.

Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:2005-2008



Author Affiliations



From the Department of Emergency Medicine, University Medical Center, State University of New York, Stony Brook.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Prognostic Significance of Between-Arm Blood Pressure Differences
Agarwal et al.
Hypertension 2008;51:657-662.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Consistency of Blood Pressure Differences Between the Left and Right Arms
Eguchi et al.
Arch Intern Med 2007;167:388-393.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Unilateral Measurement of Blood Pressure May Mask the Diagnosis or Delay the Effective Treatment of Hypertension
Karagiannis et al.
ANGIOLOGY 2005;56:565-569.
ABSTRACT  

Subclavian artery stenosis: Prevalence, risk factors, and association with cardiovascular diseases
Shadman et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:618-623.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Does This Patient Have an Acute Thoracic Aortic Dissection?
Klompas
JAMA 2002;287:2262-2272.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Blood Pressure Difference Between Arms
Bursztyn
Arch Intern Med 1997;157:818-818.
ABSTRACT  

Blood Pressure Difference Between Arms-Reply
Hollander and Singer
Arch Intern Med 1997;157:818-818.
ABSTRACT  

A Century of Indirect Blood Pressure Measurement: Back to Basics
Cushman
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:1922-1923.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.