You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 156 No. 22, 9 DECEMBER 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Impact of Screening for Mental Health Concerns on Health Service Utilization and Functional Status in Primary Care Patients

Douglas R. Reifler, MD; Holly S. Kessler; Elizabeth J. Bernhard, MA; Andrew C. Leon, PhD; Gary J. Martin, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(22):2593-2599.


Abstract

Background
Mental health concerns are common in primary care patients and are often inadequately addressed by primary care physicians.

Objective
To assess the impact of screening for mental disorders in internal medicine patients.

Methods
Randomly selected patients (n=358) visiting physicians in 2 firms of an urban academic internal medicine clinic were screened for mental disorders using the 16-item Symptom-Driven Diagnostic System for Primary Care (Upjohn Co, Kalamazoo, Mich) first-stage screening questionnaire. In the experimental firm, physicians received the screening results and then administered second-stage diagnostic modules. In the control firm, physicians were not notified of the results of the screening questionnaire. Baseline and 3-month function were assessed using the SF-36 Health Survey, the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale, and the Sheehan Patient-Rated Anxiety Scale. Patient satisfaction and health care utilization were also assessed by questionnaire at baseline and after 3 months.

Results
Patients screening positively for any mental disorder (n=238, 66.5%) had markedly lower baseline functional status than those screening negatively (P<.05 on all 8 SF-36 Health Survey subscales) and more total (±SD) outpatient visits over 3 months (4.5±5.5 vs 2.5±2.6 visits, P=.001). Among patients who screened positively, functional outcomes and patient satisfaction were similar in experimental and control groups; mean utilization (±SD) was lower in the experimental group (3.7±3.9 vs 5.3±6.7 total outpatient visits at 3 months, P=.06; 0.9±1.5 vs 2.1 ±3.7 visits to non—mental health specialists, P=.003; 0.2±0.5 vs 0.4±0.9 x-ray films per patient, P=.01). The follow-up response rate was 286 (79.9%) of 358 patients.

Conclusions
The 16-item first-stage Symptom-Driven Diagnostic System for Primary Care screening questionnaire for mental disorders can identify primary care patients who are at risk for lower functional status and higher utilization. Use of the Symptom-Driven Diagnostic System for Primary Care second-stage diagnostic modules in patients who screened positively for mental disorders was associated with lower utilization rates but had no impact on functional outcome or patient satisfaction after 3 months.

Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:2593-2599



Author Affiliations

From the Division of General Internal Medicine, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Ill (Drs Reifler and Martin and Mss Kessler and Bernhard), and the Department of Psychiatry, Cornell University Medical School, New York, NY (Dr Leon).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Mental Health Conditions are Associated With Increased Health Care Utilization Among Urban Family Medicine Patients
Fogarty et al.
J Am Board Fam Med 2008;21:398-407.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening and case-finding instruments for depression: a meta-analysis
Gilbody et al.
CMAJ 2008;178:997-1003.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Exploration of the Value of Health-Related Quality-of-Life Information From Clinical Research and Into Clinical Practice
Guyatt et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82:1229-1239.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Precision of Health-Related Quality-of-Life Data Compared With Other Clinical Measures
Hahn et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82:1244-1254.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving the detection and management of depression in primary care
Gilbody et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12:149-155.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Guideline adherence rates and interprofessional variation in a vignette study of depression
Tiemeier et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2002;11:214-218.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening for Depression in Adults: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Pignone et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2002;136:765-776.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Screening and Assessing Adult Asthmatics for Anxiety Disorders
Davis et al.
Clin Nurs Res 2002;11:173-189.
ABSTRACT  

Questionnaires for depression and anxiety
Pignone et al.
BMJ 2001;323:167-167.
FULL TEXT  

Primary Care Physicians' Approach to Depressive Disorders: Effects of Physician Specialty and Practice Structure
Williams et al.
Arch Fam Med 1999;8:58-67.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Ten-Year Review of the Validity and Clinical Utility of Depression Screening
Schade et al.
Psychiatr. Serv. 1998;49:55-61.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.