You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 156 No. 3, 12 FEBRUARY 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Do Actions Reported by Physicians in Training Conflict With Consensus Guidelines on Ethics?

Michael J. Green, MD, MS; Gary Mitchell, MD; Carol B. Stocking, PhD; Christine K. Cassel, MD; Mark Siegler, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(3):298-304.


Abstract

Objective
To assess the extent to which actions reported by internal medicine trainees conflict with published guidelines on ethics.

Methods
A confidential survey was sent to a random sample (N=1000) of associate members of the American College of Physicians (ACP). Questions were asked about ethical decision making in areas addressed by the guidelines in the ACP Ethics Manual. Quoted manual guidelines were provided, followed by 55 yes or no questions, such that a yes answer represented an action that conflicted with a guideline. There were two follow-up mailings to nonresponders.

Results
Forty percent (n=397) completed the questionnaire; 17% indicated they were aware of the guidelines on ethics. On average, associates responded yes to 16% of questions where a yes response indicated they have acted outside guidelines on ethics one or more times. The mean number of responses (n=55) that conflicted with a guideline was 7.6 per person (SD, 4.7 responses; range, 0 to 33 responses). Ninety-eight percent of respondents reported actions falling outside a guideline one or more times and 80% did so four or more times. The most frequently reported reason (965/3219 [30%]) from a list of four choices for acting outside a guideline was "I was aware of the guideline, but this did not represent an ethical dilemma to me."

Conclusions
Few responding ACP associates indicated awareness of the ACP guidelines on ethics. Physicians in training nevertheless reported acting according to the presented guidelines most of the time, although nearly all respondents acted outside a guideline at least once, and some did so many times. Reported behaviors were sometimes inconsistent with consensus ethical standards that apply to internists. Physicians in training need to know more about ethical standards that apply to their own practice and should be aware when their actions deviate from ethical norms. Before acting outside guidelines on ethics, trainees should discuss their conflicts with others, such as attending physicians, clinical ethicists, or hospital ethics committees.

(Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:298-304)



Author Affiliations

From the MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics (Drs Green, Mitchell, Stocking, and Siegler) and Department of Medicine (Dr Cassel), University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill. Dr Green is now with the University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison; Dr Mitchell is now with Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis; and Dr Cassel is now with Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Being 'one cog in a bigger machine': a qualitative study investigating ethical challenges perceived by junior doctors
McDougall
Clin Ethics 2009;4:85-90.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Combating junior doctors' "4am logic": a challenge for medical ethics education
McDougall
J. Med. Ethics 2009;35:203-206.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The junior doctor as ethically unique
McDougall
J. Med. Ethics 2008;34:268-270.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The ethical junior: a typology of ethical problems faced by house officers
McDougall and Sokol
JRSM 2008;101:67-70.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Are Continuity Clinic Patients Less Satisfied When Residents Have a Heavy Inpatient Workload?
Feddock et al.
Eval Health Prof 2005;28:390-399.
ABSTRACT  

Hidden Ethical Dilemmas in Psychiatric Residency Training: The Psychiatry Resident as Dual Agent
Hoop
Acad. Psychiatry 2004;28:183-189.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

"Cold calling" in psychiatric follow up studies: is it justified?
Tyrer et al.
J. Med. Ethics 2003;29:238-242.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Lying to Each Other: When Internal Medicine Residents Use Deception With Their Colleagues
Green et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2317-2323.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Lying for Patients: Physician Deception of Third-Party Payers
Freeman et al.
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:2263-2270.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.