This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (41)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Daniel C. Knockaert, MD, PhD; Karl S. Dujardin, MD; Herman J. Bobbaers, MD, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(6):618-620.

Abstract
Background
A causal diagnosis cannot be established in 10% to 25% of the patients who are studied for fever of unknown origin (FUO). The long-term clinical outcome of these patients cannot be inferred from the literature. This study describes the results of a 5-year follow-up of 61 patients studied for FUO and discharged from the hospital with no causal diagnosis being established.

Methods
Patients meeting the classic criteria for FUO who were studied in the 1980s and discharged from the hospital without a causal diagnosis were followed up for at least 5 years or until death. Follow-up was performed by review of the patients' medical records or by consulting the treating physician and occasionally the patients themselves. The final diagnosis, clinical course (resolution of the fever and required treatments), and mortality rate were studied.

Results
Of a cohort of 199 patients with FUO, 61 individuals (30%) were discharged from the hospital without a final diagnosis being established. A definite diagnosis could be established in 12 cases, mostly (eight of 12) within 2 months after discharge. Thirty-one individuals became symptom free during hospitalization or shortly following discharge. Eighteen patients had persisting or recurring fever for several months or even years after discharge, but 10 of them were considered to be finally cured. Four patients were treated with corticosteroids and six patients required intermittent therapy with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents. Six patients died, but the cause of death was considered to be related to the disease that had caused FUO in only two cases.

Conclusion
No single disease, particularly not tuberculosis, was found to be a cause of undiagnosed FUO. Most cases resolved spontaneously, and corticosteroids were seldom required. Most symptomatic patients could be treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The mortality rate in patients with undiagnosed FUO who were followed up for 5 years or more was only 3.2%.

(Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:618-620)

Author Affiliations
From the Department of General Internal Medicine, Gasthuisberg University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Fever of Unknown Origin: The Evolving Definition
Bryan
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:1003-1004.
FULL TEXT  

From Prolonged Febrile Illness to Fever of Unknown Origin: The Challenge Continues
Vanderschueren et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:1033-1041.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Comprehensive Evidence-Based Approach to Fever of Unknown Origin
Mourad et al.
Arch Intern Med 2003;163:545-551.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fever of Unknown Origin Caused by Multiple Myeloma: A Report of 9 Cases
Mueller et al.
Arch Intern Med 2002;162:1305-1309.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Long-Term Follow-up of Children with Fever of Unknown Origin
Talano and Katz
CLIN PEDIATR 2000;39:715-717.