You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 156 No. 7, 8 APRIL 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (45)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Who Decides?

Physicians' Willingness to Use Life-Sustaining Treatment

Laura C. Hanson, MD, MPH; Marion Danis, MD; Joanne M. Garrett, PhD; Elizabeth Mutran, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(7):785-789.


Abstract

Background
Physician specialty training is associated with variations in the use of medical treatment for specific diseases.

Objective
To examine whether physicians' specialties predict differences in willingness to use life-sustaining treatments.

Methods
One hundred fifty-eight physicians (response rate, 85%) who cared for 378 hospitalized patients with end-stage congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, malignant neoplasms, or hepatic cirrhosis were interviewed to assess their thresholds for use of specific life-sustaining treatments. Their patients were then followed up to determine whether decisions were made to use or withhold cardiopulmonary resuscitation, ventilator support, or intensive care. Physicians' attitudes, their stated thresholds for treatment use, and their use of these treatments in daily practice were compared by specialty group.

Results
Physicians recommended cardiopulmonary resuscitation and ventilator support for patients with end-stage congestive heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease if the chance for survival was at least 48%, but they required a predicted survival of at least 74% for patients with cancer. For a patient with end-stage congestive heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiologists were consistently more willing than other physicians to use life-sustaining treatments. In practice, decisions to use or withhold such treatments were made for 151 patients with end-stage diseases. Compared with other physicians, cardiologists were least likely to issue orders to withhold treatment and most likely to use life-sustaining treatments for patients they treated. Oncologists rarely used such treatments and issued orders to withhold these treatments much more often.

Conclusion
Physician specialty is associated with differences in willingness to use, and in actual use of, life-sustaining treatments.

(Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:785-789)



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Medicine (Drs Hanson, Danis, and Garrett) and Health Behavior and Health Education (Dr Mutran), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Hospital staff attributions of the causes of physician variation in end-of-life treatment intensity
Larochelle et al.
Palliat Med 2009;23:460-470.
ABSTRACT  

Perceptions of patients on the utility or futility of end-of-life treatment.
Rodriguez and Young
J. Med. Ethics 2006;32:444-449.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Prognosis and Decision Making in Severe Stroke
G. Holloway et al.
JAMA 2005;294:725-733.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Palliative Wound Care at the End of Life
Hughes et al.
Home Health Care Management Practice 2005;17:196-202.
ABSTRACT  

National questionnaire survey on what influences doctors' decisions about admission to intensive care
Escher et al.
BMJ 2004;329:425.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Advance Directives, Due Process, and Medical Futility
Berger
ANN INTERN MED 2004;140:402-403.
FULL TEXT  

Determining resuscitation preferences of elderly inpatients: a review of the literature
Frank et al.
CMAJ 2003;169:795-799.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Do Specialists Differ on Do-Not-Resuscitate Decisions?
Kelly et al.
Chest 2002;121:957-963.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A Nationwide Study of Decisions to Forego Life-Prolonging Treatment in Dutch Medical Practice
Groenewoud et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:357-363.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Factors Associated With Use of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Seriously Ill Hospitalized Adults
Goodlin et al.
JAMA 1999;282:2333-2339.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit: Part II: Nelson JE, Meier DE Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit Part II Intensive Care Med 1999,14 189-199
Nelson and Meier
J Intensive Care Med 1999;14:189-199.
 

Variability in Physician Opinion on Limiting Pediatric Life Support
Randolph et al.
Pediatrics 1999;103:46e-46.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Publications in Subspecialty Journals on End-of-Life Ethics
Heffner et al.
Arch Intern Med 1997;157:685-690.
ABSTRACT  

The Use of Living Wills at the End of Life: A National Study
Hanson and Rodgman
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:1018-1022.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.