You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 156 No. 9, 13 MAY 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Risk of Rupture of Large Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Disagreement Among Vascular Surgeons

Frank A. Lederle, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(9):1007-1009.


Abstract

Background
Many patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) who are cared for by internists are not good candidates for surgery. Elective repair is usually deferred in these patients until the AAA reaches a diameter at which the estimated risk of rupture is believed to outweigh the operative risk. The risk of rupture is usually estimated by a consulting vascular surgeon, but whether these estimates are well-supported or consistent has not previously been assessed.

Objective
To determine the agreement among vascular surgeons about the risk of rupture of large AAAs.

Methods
All individual members of the Society for Vascular Surgery (Manchester, Mass) residing in the United States were mailed a survey asking for their estimates of the likelihood of rupture of large AAAs.

Results
The response rate was 66% and the 257 respondents who reported that they were practicing vascular surgeons constitute the study group. The median estimates of the 1-year risk of rupture were 20% for 6.5-cm AAAs and 30% for 7.5-cm AAAs, with one third of respondents estimating 50% or greater risk of rupture for 7.5-cm AAAs and nearly one third estimating 30% or greater risk of rupture for 6.5-cm AAAs. The responses spanned a wide range and were generally much higher than would be expected based on published data and estimates.

Conclusions
This survey demonstrates profound disagreement among vascular surgeons about the risk of rupture of large AAAs, reflecting a lack of pertinent published data. Better data are necessary and are being collected.

(Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1007-1009)



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Medicine, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of Minnesota.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
Norwood et al.
Postgrad. Med. J. 2007;83:21-27.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Rupture Rate of Large Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in Patients Refusing or Unfit for Elective Repair
Lederle et al.
JAMA 2002;287:2968-2972.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.