You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 157 No. 1, 13 JANUARY 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Musculoskeletal Pain as an Indicator of Occult Malignancy

Yield of Bone Scintigraphy

Arnold F. Jacobson, MD, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 1997;157(1):105-109.


Abstract

Background
When musculoskeletal pain is persistent or out of proportion to clinical findings, diagnostic imaging is often used to evaluate for the presence of occult pathologic conditions.

Objective
To examine the efficacy of bone scintigraphy for identifying occult malignancy in such patients.

Methods
Bone scans of 491 patients with new or recurrent complaints of musculoskeletal pain and no previously known malignancy were retrospectively reviewed. The findings of each scan were classified into 1 of the following categories: (A) no evidence of malignancy; (B) equivocal (1-3 lesions of uncertain significance); or (C) probable metastatic disease (>3 lesions without trauma or other benign explanation). All diagnoses of malignancy established within 6 months of the bone scan were then determined from review of radiological and clinical records.

Results
The distribution of scan interpretations was as follows: category A, 386 (79%); category B, 84 (17%); and category C, 21 (4%). Among the 181 patients younger than 50 years, 161 (89%) had category A and 20 (11%) had category B scans. Of the 310 patients aged 50 years or older, 226 (73%) had scans in category A, 64 (21%) in category B, and 21 (7%) in category C. Thirty patients (6%) had malignancy involving bone, 29 among those aged 50 years or older. In patients aged 50 years or older, 10 (16%) of 64 with equivocal scan findings (category B) and 19 (90%) of 21 with widespread abnormalities (category C) had malignancy involving bone. Initial radiographs of symptomatic sites showed lytic or blastic bone abnormalities suggestive of malignancy in 16 (59%) of the 29 older patients in whom this diagnosis was confirmed.

Conclusions
In patients aged 50 years or older, the yield of bone scintigraphy for identification of occult malignancy (29/310; 9%) is sufficient to justify its use in the investigation of the cause of problematic bone or musculoskeletal symptoms.

Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:105-109



Author Affiliations

From the Nuclear Medicine Section, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Seattle, Wash.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Diagnostic Evaluation of Low Back Pain with Emphasis on Imaging
Jarvik and Deyo
ANN INTERN MED 2002;137:586-597.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

BONE SCANS PREDICTIVE FOR OCCULT MALIGNANCY
JWatch General 1997;1997:2-2.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.