You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 157 No. 14, 28 JULY 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Comparison of Behavior Therapy With and Without Very-Low-Energy Diet in the Treatment of Morbid Obesity

A 5-Year Outcome

Tuula Pekkarinen, MD; Pertti Mustajoki, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1997;157(14):1581-1585.


Abstract

Background
Very-low-energy diets (VLEDs) together with behavior therapy (BT) are widely used in the treatment of morbid obesity, but there is no evidence of their long-term effectiveness as compared with behavior therapy alone.

Methods
Fifty-nine morbidly obese patients (25 men and 34 women; mean weight, 132.8 ±20.7 kg; mean age, 43.1 ±9.2 years) were treated with combined therapy of VLED and BT or BT alone. No maintenance program was used. Eighty-seven percent of eligible patients were contacted 4.8 to 6.2 years after the program.

Results
During treatment, 56% of patients dropped out of the VLED+BT group and 28% from the BT group (P=.03). High scores on the Symptom Checklist—90R before treatment predicted dropout from the VLED+BT group, but not from BT. At the end of therapy, mean weight change was -22.9 kg in the VLED+BT group and -8.9 kg in the BT group (P<.001). The overall weight change from pretreatment to the 5-year follow-up was greater in the VLED+BT group than in the BT group (-16.9 kg vs -4.9 kg, respectively; P=.03). Men succeeded better in the VLED+BT group than in BT. Among the dropouts, the mean weight change from baseline was +5.2 kg in the VLED+BT group and +13.0 kg in the BT group.

Conclusions
Our data suggest that in the treatment of morbid obesity, VLED combined with BT may produce a better 5-year maintenance than BT alone, especially among men. A satisfactory weight loss can be achieved without a maintenance program.

Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:1581-1585



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Systematic Review: An Evaluation of Major Commercial Weight Loss Programs in the United States
Tsai and Wadden
ANN INTERN MED 2005;142:56-66.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effects of Walking Training on Weight Maintenance After a Very-Low-Energy Diet in Premenopausal Obese Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Fogelholm et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2177-2184.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Immediate and long term effects of weight reduction in obese people with asthma: randomised controlled study
Stenius-Aarniala et al.
BMJ 2000;320:827-832.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.