You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 157 No. 15, 11 AUGUST 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Gallstone Size and Risk of Pancreatitis

Andrew K. Diehl, MD, MSc; Donald R. Holleman, Jr, MD; James B. Chapman, MD; Wayne H. Schwesinger, MD; William E. Kurtin, PhD

Arch Intern Med. 1997;157(15):1674-1678.


Abstract

Background
The treatment of patients with gallstones who have suffered a first episode of acute biliary pain is controversial. Recent guidelines suggest that such patients may choose to observe the "pattern" of their pain over time before deciding about therapy.

Objective
To determine clinical factors that would identify patients at high risk for 2 important complications: acute biliary pancreatitis and acute cholecystitis.

Methods
We collected sociodemographic and clinical data on patients undergoing cholecystectomy after acute biliary pancreatitis, acute cholecystitis, or uncomplicated biliary pain. The physical characteristics of gallstones recovered at surgery were also recorded. Patients with pancreatitis and patients with cholecystitis were compared with patients with uncomplicated pain.

Results
In univariate analyses, patients with acute pancreatitis were significantly more likely to have at least 1 gallstone smaller than 5 mm in diameter, 20 or more gallstones, gallstones described as mulberry shaped, and a lower total gallstone weight than patients with uncomplicated pain. Pancreatitis was unrelated to patient age, sex, race or ethnicity, use of alcohol or tobacco, or clinical comorbidity. In a logistic regression model, acute pancreatitis was associated with a stone diameter of less than 5 mm (odds ratio, 4.51; P=.007) and with mulberry-shaped gallstones (odds ratio, 2.25; P=.04). No socio-demographic, clinical, or gallstone characteristics were consistently associated with acute cholecystitis.

Conclusions
Patients with at least 1 gallstone smaller than 5 mm in diameter have a more than 4-fold increased risk of presenting with acute biliary pancreatitis. A policy of watchful waiting in such cases is unwarranted.

Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:1674-1678



Author Affiliations

From the Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine (Drs Diehl and Chapman), and the Department of Surgery (Dr Schwesinger), University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio; the Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Dr Holleman); and the Department of Chemistry, Trinity University, San Antonio (Dr Kurtin).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Gallstone Size and Risk for Pancreatitis
Cohen and Diehl
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:543-544.
FULL TEXT  

Gallstones and Acute Pancreatitis: Bigger Is Better
JWatch Women's Health 1997;1997:2-2.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.