You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 157 No. 18, 13 OCTOBER 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  COMMENTARY
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (12)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Gag Rules and Trade Secrets in Managed Care Contracts

Ethical and Legal Concerns

Howard Brody, MD, PhD; Vence L. Bonham, Jr, JD

Arch Intern Med. 1997;157(18):2037-2043.


Abstract

Gag rules—clauses in managed care contracts that prevent physicians from disclosing information that the plan may find disparaging, but that could relate directly to the patient's health—have recently been the subject of ethical condemnation and legislative prohibition. Another serious problem in managed care contracts, trade secrets, or guidelines and quality assurance mechanisms that are imposed on physicians while their origins are shrouded in proprietary secrecy, have by contrast received little attention. Responses to these ethical challenges to the physician's integrity must involve individual physicians, managed care organizations, professional organizations, and public policymakers.

Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:2037-2043



Author Affiliations

Center for Ethics and Humanities in the Life Sciences Michigan State University Bldg C201, E Fee Hall East Lansing, MI 48824; East Lansing



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Capitation Rates and Proprietary Secrets
Herbert Rakatansky
Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(8):930.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Managed Care Bashing
Howard Brody, Vence Bonham, David U. Himmelstein, and Steffie Woolhandler
Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(10):1154-1155.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Conflict of Interest in Clinical Practice
Tonelli
Chest 2007;132:664-670.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Do Physicians Not Offer Useful Services Because Of Coverage Restrictions?
Wynia et al.
Health Aff (Millwood) 2003;22:190-197.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physicians' Ethical Beliefs About Cost-Control Arrangements
Sulmasy et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:649-657.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Medical Professionalism in Society
Wynia et al.
NEJM 1999;341:1612-1616.
FULL TEXT  

Lying for Patients: Physician Deception of Third-Party Payers
Freeman et al.
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:2263-2270.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Managed Care Bashing
Brody et al.
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:1154-1155.
FULL TEXT  

Capitation Rates and Proprietary Secrets
Rakatansky
Arch Intern Med 1998;158:930-930.
FULL TEXT  

Bound to Gag
Himmelstein and Woolhandler
Arch Intern Med 1997;157:2033-2033.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.