You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 157 No. 22, 8 DECEMBER 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (18)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Gastrointestinal Tract Bleeding Associated With Naproxen Sodium vs Ibuprofen

Brian L. Strom, MD, MPH; Rita Schinnar, MPA; Warren B. Bilker, PhD; Harold Feldman, MD, MS; John T. Farrar, MD; Jeffrey L. Carson, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1997;157(22):2626-2631.


Abstract

Background
The risk of gastrointestinal tract bleeding requiring hospitalization associated with naproxen sodium was compared with that with ibuprofen, using a prescription database to approximate over-the-counter dosing.

Objective
To evaluate the safety of naproxen sodium.

Methods
A claims database containing Ohio Medicaid data from January 1986 through February 1993 and Michigan Medicaid data from April 1983 through July 1993 was used to compare 101318 patients dispensed naproxen sodium with 277 601 patients dispensed ibuprofen. Using a case-cohort design, all 59 patients from the full cohort who had been hospitalized with upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding (UGIB) that developed within 14 days after the first prescription for the study drugs were compared with a subcohort made up of a 10% random sample of subjects selected from the combined drug cohorts.

Results
The incidence of UGIB occurring within 14 days after the first prescription in the naproxen sodium cohort was 26 (0.026%) of 101 318 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.017%-0.038%), compared with 33 (0.012%) of 277 601 patients (95% CI, 0.008%-0.017%) in the ibuprofen cohort. Overall, the use of naproxen sodium vs ibuprofen was associated with an adjusted relative risk of 2.0 (95% CI, 1.1-3.8). Among people with multiple prescriptions, the crude relative risk for those receiving therapy in a dose typical of over-the-counter use was 4.1 (95% CI, 1.2-13.8).

Conclusions
The overall incidence of UGIB is low with both drugs. There is little additional absolute risk posed by the use of low-dose naproxen sodium, compared with low-dose ibuprofen, despite an increased relative risk. However, given the widespread use of these drugs, a substantial number of additional cases of UGIB could result from use of naproxen sodium. This increased risk should be considered, especially for patients whose baseline risk of UGIB is elevated.

Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:2626-2631



Author Affiliations

From the Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Drs Strom, Schinnar, Bilker, Feldman, Farrar, and Carson), the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (Drs Strom, Bilker, Feldman, and Farrar), the Division of General Internal Medicine (Drs Strom and Carson) the Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division (Dr Feldman), Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia; and the Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey/Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick (Dr Carson).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Retrospective Drug Utilization Review, Prescribing Errors, and Clinical Outcomes
Hennessy et al.
JAMA 2003;290:1494-1499.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment of Osteoporosis: Are Physicians Missing an Opportunity?*{{dagger}}
Freedman et al.
JBJS 2000;82:1063-1063.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.