This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (10)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

eil J. Farber, MD; Mark S. Berger, MD; Elizabeth B. Davis, PhD; Joan Weiner, PhD; E. Gil Boyer, EdD; Peter A. Ubel, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1997;157(5):501-504.

Abstract
Background
Health insurance fraud committed by patients may be an increasing problem given the number of underinsured and uninsured people in the United States. Physicians recognizing acts of health insurance fraud perpetrated by patients face an ethical dilemma: should they disclose the incident to the insurance company, or protect patient confidentiality?

Objective
To explore physicians' attitudes toward the reporting of patient-initiated health insurance fraud.

Methods
Three hundred seven physician members of the American College of Physicians returned a mailed questionnaire that presented 6 case vignettes (3 variables) of patients who used a relative's insurance to obtain health care in the past. For each vignette, respondents were asked whether the treating physician should report insurance fraud to the health insurance carrier.

Results
Sixty-three respondents (20.7%) indicated that physicians should report all the patients presented in the vignettes, while 45 (14.8%) indicated none should be reported; the rest indicated that the decisions to report should be based on the characteristics presented, with acute vs terminal illness (P<.001), history of fraud (P<.001), and wealth of the patient (P<.001) all causing physicians to be more likely to report the patient to the health insurance carrier. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that type of practice (P=.04) and respondents' experiences with insurance fraud (P=.03) had significant effects on the willingness to report patients.

Conclusions
Physicians are divided about whether to report patients who have committed insurance fraud. Their decisions to report insurance fraud are influenced by their attitudes and demographic features, as well as by patient factors.

Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:501-504

Author Affiliations
From the Section of General Internal Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Allegheny University of the Health Sciences (Dr Farber), Section of Hematology/ Oncology (Dr Berger) and Section of General Internal Medicine (Dr Ubel), Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Department of Management and Information Systems, St Joseph's University (Drs Davis and Boyer), Management Department, Drexel University (Dr Weiner) Philadelphia, Pa.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

An analysis of one potential form of health care fraud in Canada
Stelfox and Redelmeier
CMAJ 2003;169:118-119.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Coding of Pediatric Behavioral and Mental Disorders
Rushton et al.
Pediatrics 2002;110:e8-8.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Lying to Each Other: When Internal Medicine Residents Use Deception With Their Colleagues
Green et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:2317-2323.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Lying for Patients: Physician Deception of Third-Party Payers
Freeman et al.
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:2263-2270.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Physicians Who Report Health Insurance Fraud and Their Practice Type: Health Maintenance Organization vs Fee-for-Service
Salom
Arch Intern Med 1997;157:2270-2270.
ABSTRACT  

Physicians Who Report Health Insurance Fraud and Their Practice Type: Health Maintenance Organization vs Fee-for-Service-Reply
Farber et al.
Arch Intern Med 1997;157:2270-2270.
ABSTRACT