This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (127)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Bacterial Infections  • Infectious Diseases, Other  • Pneumonia  • Infectious Diseases  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

An Interventional Trial

Steven J. Atlas, MD, MPH; Theodore I. Benzer, MD, PhD; Leila H. Borowsky, MPH; YuChiao Chang, PhD; Diann C. Burnham, RN; Joshua P. Metlay, MD, PhD; Ethan A. Halm, MD; Daniel E. Singer, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1350-1356.

Background  Patients with community-acquired pneumonia who are at low risk for short-term mortality can be identified using a validated prediction rule, the Pneumonia Severity Index. Such patients should be candidates for outpatient treatment, yet many are hospitalized.

Objective  To assess a program to safely increase the proportion of low-risk patients with pneumonia treated at home.

Methods  The intervention provided physicians with the Pneumonia Severity Index score and corresponding mortality risk for eligible patients and offered enhanced visiting nurse services and the antibiotic clarithromycin. Prospectively enrolled, consecutive low-risk patients with pneumonia presenting to an emergency department during the intervention period (n = 166) were compared with consecutive retrospective controls (n = 147) identified during the prior year. A second group of 208 patients from the study hospital who participated in the Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team cohort study served as controls for patient-reported measures of recovery.

Results  There were no significant baseline differences between patients in the intervention and control groups. The percentage initially treated as outpatients increased from 42% in the control period to 57% in the intervention period (36% relative increase; 95% confidence interval, 8%-72%; P=.01). However, more outpatients during the intervention period were subsequently admitted to the study hospital (9% vs 0%). When any admission to the study hospital within 4 weeks of presentation was considered, there was a trend toward more patients receiving all their care as outpatients in the intervention group (42% vs 52%; 25% relative increase; 95% confidence interval -2% to 59%; P=.07). No patient in the intervention group died in the 4-week follow-up period. Symptom resolution and functional status were not diminished. Satisfaction with overall care was similar, but patients treated in the outpatient setting during the intervention were less frequently satisfied with the initial treatment location than comparable control patients (71% vs 90%; P=.04).

Conclusions  Use of a risk-based algorithm coupled with enhanced outpatient services effectively identified low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia in the emergency department and safely increased the proportion initially treated as outpatients. Outpatients in the intervention group were more likely to be subsequently admitted than were controls, lessening the net impact of the intervention.

From the Medical Practices Evaluation Center and the General Medicine Division, Medical Services (Drs Atlas, Chang, Metlay, Halm, and Singer and Mss Borowsky and Burnham), and the Department of Emergency Medicine (Dr Benzer), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

BTS guidelines for the management of community acquired pneumonia in adults: update 2009
Lim et al.
Thorax 2009;64:iii1-iii55.
FULL TEXT  

Can a change in policy reduce emergency hospital admissions? Effect of admission avoidance team, guideline implementation and maximising the observation unit
Gonnah et al.
Emerg. Med. J. 2008;25:575-578.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Implementing a hospital guideline on pneumonia: a semi-quantitative review
Cortoos et al.
Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:358-367.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Economic evaluation of adherence to treatment guidelines in nonintensive care pneumonia
Menendez et al.
Eur Respir J 2007;29:751-756.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Outcomes for Low-Risk Outpatients and Inpatients With Pneumonia: A Propensity-Adjusted Analysis
Labarere et al.
Chest 2007;131:480-488.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A prospective comparison of severity scores for identifying patients with severe community acquired pneumonia: reconsidering what is meant by severe pneumonia
Buising et al.
Thorax 2006;61:419-424.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Increasing the Intensity of Implementing Pneumonia Guidelines: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Yealy et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;143:881-894.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections
Woodhead et al.
Eur Respir J 2005;26:1138-1180.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Understanding variation in quality of antibiotic use for community-acquired pneumonia: effect of patient, professional and hospital factors
Schouten et al.
J Antimicrob Chemother 2005;56:575-582.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving compliance with hospital antibiotic guidelines: a time-series intervention analysis
Mol et al.
J Antimicrob Chemother 2005;55:550-557.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Outpatient Care Compared with Hospitalization for Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Randomized Trial in Low-Risk Patients
Carratala et al.
ANN INTERN MED 2005;142:165-172.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Decisions about Treating Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Mandell
ANN INTERN MED 2005;142:215-216.
FULL TEXT  

Getting Physicians to Make "The Switch": The Role of Clinical Guidelines in the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Hagaman et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2005;20:15-21.
ABSTRACT  

Limited Impact of a Multicenter Intervention To Improve the Quality and Efficiency of Pneumonia Care
Halm et al.
Chest 2004;126:100-107.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

What Is the Prognosis for Using the Pneumonia Severity Index To Make Site-of-Care Decisions In Community-Acquired Pneumonia?
Niederman
Chest 2003;124:2051-2053.
FULL TEXT  

Cost and Incidence of Social Comorbidities in Low-Risk Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia Admitted to a Public Hospital
Goss et al.
Chest 2003;124:2148-2155.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Duration of length of stay in pneumonia: influence of clinical factors and hospital type
Menendez et al.
Eur Respir J 2003;22:643-648.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Assessment of illness severity in community acquired pneumonia: a useful new prediction tool?
Woodhead
Thorax 2003;58:371-372.
FULL TEXT  

A prediction rule to identify allocation of inpatient care in community-acquired pneumonia
Espana et al.
Eur Respir J 2003;21:695-701.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Testing Strategies in the Initial Management of Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Metlay and Fine
ANN INTERN MED 2003;138:109-118.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Halm and Teirstein
NEJM 2002;347:2039-2045.
FULL TEXT  

Severe Community-acquired Pneumonia: Use of Intensive Care Services and Evaluation of American and British Thoracic Society Diagnostic Criteria
Angus et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2002;166:717-723.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Community-acquired pneumonia guidelines: much guidance, but not much evidence
Woodhead
Eur Respir J 2002;20:1-3.
FULL TEXT  

Guidelines for managing community acquired pneumonia in adults
Keeley
BMJ 2002;324:436-437.
FULL TEXT  

BTS Guidelines for the Management of Community Acquired Pneumonia in Adults
Thorax 2001;56:iv1-64.
FULL TEXT  

Evaluation of a Computerized Diagnostic Decision Support System for Patients with Pneumonia: Study Design Considerations
Aronsky et al.
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2001;8:473-485.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nonsevere Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Correlation Between Cause and Severity or Comorbidity
Falguera et al.
Arch Intern Med 2001;161:1866-1872.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Community-acquired Pneumonia . Diagnosis, Assessment of Severity, Antimicrobial Therapy, and Prevention
Niederman et al.
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2001;163:1730-1754.
FULL TEXT  

Applying a Prediction Rule To Identify Low-Risk Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Marras et al.
Chest 2000;118:1339-1343.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Respiratory antibiotic use and Clostridium difficile infection: is it the drugs or is it the doctors?
WILCOX
Thorax 2000;55:633-634.
FULL TEXT  

Older Persons' Preferences for Home vs Hospital Care in the Treatment of Acute Illness
Fried et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:1501-1506.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Implementation of Admission Decision Support for Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Dean et al.
Chest 2000;117:1368-1377.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment and outcomes of community-acquired pneumonia at Canadian hospitals
Feagan
CMAJ 2000;162:1415-1420.
 

Severity prediction rules in community acquired pneumonia: a validation study
Lim et al.
Thorax 2000;55:219-223.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Understanding Physician Adherence With a Pneumonia Practice Guideline: Effects of Patient, System, and Physician Factors
Halm et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:98-104.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Processes and Outcomes of Care for Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Results From the Pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT) Cohort Study
Fine et al.
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:970-980.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Time to Clinical Stability for Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Siegel et al.
JAMA 1999;281:231-232.
FULL TEXT