You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 158 No. 13, July 13, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Investigation
 This Article
 •Full text
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Bacterial Infections
 •Tuberculosis/ Other Mycobacterium
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Are US Hospitals Making Progress in Implementing Guidelines for Prevention of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Transmission?

Lilia P. Manangan, RN, MPH; Dawn N. Simonds, BS; Gina Pugliese, RN, MS; Karen Kroc, BS; Shailen N. Banerjee, PhD; Judith R. Rudnick, MD; Kristin Steingraber, BS; William R. Jarvis, MD

Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1440-1444.

Background  Outbreaks of tuberculosis (TB) in hospitals have occurred when the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guideline recommendations for preventing the transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis were not fully implemented.

Objective  To determine whether US hospitals are making progress in implementing the CDC guidelines for preventing TB.

Methods  In 1992, we surveyed all public (city, county, Veterans Affairs, and primary medical school–affiliated) US hospitals (n=632) and 444 (20%) random samples of all private hospitals with 100 beds or more. In 1996, we resurveyed 136 random samples (50%) of all 1992 respondent hospitals with 6 or more TB admissions in 1991.

Results  Of the 1076 hospitals surveyed in 1992, 763 (71%) respondents returned a completed questionnaire. Among these, 536 (71%) of 755 reported having rooms that met CDC criteria for acid-fast bacilli isolation, ie, negative air pressure, 6 or more air exchanges per hour, and air directly vented to the outside. The predominant respiratory protective device for health care workers was nonfitted surgical mask and attending physicians were infrequently (50%) included in tuberculin skin-testing programs. In the 1996 resurvey, 103 (76%) of 136 respondents returned a completed questionnaire. Of these, 99 (96%) reported having rooms that met CDC criteria for acid-fast bacilli isolation. The N95 respiratory protective devices were predominantly used by health care workers, and attending physicians were increasingly (69%) included in the hospitals' tuberculin skin-testing programs.

Conclusions  Most US hospitals are making progress in the implementation of CDC guidelines for preventing the transmission of M tuberculosis.


From the Hospital Infections Program, National Center for Infectious Diseases, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga (Mss Manangan, Simonds, and Steingraber and Drs Banerjee and Jarvis), and American Hospital Association, Chicago, Ill (Mss Pugliese and Kroc). Dr Rudnick is in private practice in Atlanta. Mss Pugliese and Kroc are now private consultants in Chicago.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Nosocomial Tuberculosis Prevention Measures Among Two Groups of US Hospitals, 1992 to 1996
Manangan et al.
Chest 2000;117:380-384.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.